![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
![]()
The thumbrings help a lot in the cutting motions, hence its prevalence in primarily cutting weapons, curved or straight. It helps to "lock" the grip when impacting, reducing the vibration and helping in the "slicing" effect, with a motion led more by the elbow and the shoulder than by the wrist, a similar effect in fact than the one produced by the disc-shaped pommel on talwars.
One has to take into account, though, that the grip is a dynamic feature in fencing, so "locking" the wrist is an option, not an obligation. Playing with the "loosensess" of the thumb there's different positions of the hand available to the user, so allowing for different cutting options and also for the use of the point. The thumbrings aren't seen in swords that don't feature a good cutting blade (not necessarily curved), and although they are indeed very usual in Eastern-Europe sabres since the 17th century, they're also frequent in other weapons, like these 16th- 17th c. schiavonas. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
![]()
There's others, too, like this 17th century "wallon" hilted straight sword:
(Images Courtesy of "Antigüedades Sala") ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
![]()
And, for an interesting variation, buth with exactly the same functional purpose, take a look at this 17t-18th c. cup-hilt sword:
(Images cortesy of "Antigüedades Sala") ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
|
![]()
Hi Marc,
Thank you so much!! Excellent explanation, and great photos of some extremely nice pieces ![]() All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Thanks, Marc, good and convincing explanation.
As a former fencer, I am intrigued by these devices: they must have been of great help in saber fencing, because they increased the stability of the cut movement and the parrying defence against a saber slash. In rapiers, they must have dictated a technique totally different from the French pattern that is based on the wrist and is aimed at thrust only. In effect, these rapiers were pallasches. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
![]()
Thank you for the nice words, Jim, it's always a pleasure.
![]() Ariel, pallasches, indeed, also called very generally "Cut and thrust" sword, whatever utility may have such label... No rapier that I know of features a thumbring, given the mechanics of rapier fencing they would in fact get in the way quite annoyingly. Note that here I use the word "rapier" as a general label to define a sword of Western European design from the 16th and 17th c., designed to be used for a primarily (but not necessarily "exclusively") thrusting style of fencing... P.S. Ah, and it's "Walloon", up there, I just noticed the typo... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|