Pandai Saras Luk 9

Jean · 12th February 2011, 10:20 AM

Gustav,
The "Bugis cup" looks too wide for the hilt base, is it original and what should be the correct type of pendokok for this hilt?
Best regards

Gustav · 12th February 2011, 11:01 AM

Jean, it's fewer then 1 and half mm to wide. It came with this pendokok, I suppose it would be possible to regard this form as one of correct possible pendokok forms for such keris.

On hilt there are no visible traces from another pendokok.

Best regards

David · 12th February 2011, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gustav

Jean, it's fewer then 1 and half mm to wide. It came with this pendokok, I suppose it would be possible to regard this form as one of correct possible pendokok forms for such keris.

On hilt there are no visible traces from another pendokok.

Best regards

Gustav, i do not believe that this is the appropriate pendokok form for a Pattani keris. I am sure that Shahrial or Kai Wee would have some good examples to show you.

Gustav · 13th February 2011, 12:05 AM

David, please take a look at this website, its Dave Henkel's:

http://kerisarchipelago.150m.com/pattani&singora.htm

You will found some keris with similar bugis style pendokok.

Also this one: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...=keris+pattani

And this: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...hlight=pattani

David · 13th February 2011, 02:46 AM

Perhaps it's acceptable then Gustav. I'm certainly no expert on Pattani keris.

Still a bit too large though...

BluErf · 13th February 2011, 04:44 AM

The pendoko style can be found in N Peninsula kerises, but this particular specimen is too big for the hilt. There shd be minimal gap between the rim of the pendoko and the round base of the hilt.

Gustav · 13th February 2011, 09:48 AM

Kai Wee, I know, this is not an ideal fit, yet when I do rectify the position of hilt and pendokok to get the gap equal on all sides, the gap staying is about 1 mm, not more.

13th February 2011, 12:05 AM	#4
Gustav Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,280	David, please take a look at this website, its Dave Henkel's: http://kerisarchipelago.150m.com/pattani&singora.htm You will found some keris with similar bugis style pendokok. Also this one: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...=keris+pattani And this: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...hlight=pattani Last edited by Gustav; 13th February 2011 at 12:23 AM.

12th February 2011, 10:20 AM	#1
Jean Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,740	Gustav, The "Bugis cup" looks too wide for the hilt base, is it original and what should be the correct type of pendokok for this hilt? Best regards

12th February 2011, 11:01 AM	#2
Gustav Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,280	Jean, it's fewer then 1 and half mm to wide. It came with this pendokok, I suppose it would be possible to regard this form as one of correct possible pendokok forms for such keris. On hilt there are no visible traces from another pendokok. Best regards

13th February 2011, 02:46 AM	#5
David Keris forum moderator Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Nova Scotia Posts: 7,218	Perhaps it's acceptable then Gustav. I'm certainly no expert on Pattani keris. Still a bit too large though...

13th February 2011, 04:44 AM	#6
BluErf Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Singapore Posts: 1,180	The pendoko style can be found in N Peninsula kerises, but this particular specimen is too big for the hilt. There shd be minimal gap between the rim of the pendoko and the round base of the hilt.

13th February 2011, 09:48 AM	#7
Gustav Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,280	Kai Wee, I know, this is not an ideal fit, yet when I do rectify the position of hilt and pendokok to get the gap equal on all sides, the gap staying is about 1 mm, not more.