for share and comment

[Sajen]

Originally Posted by delor

Jean, Sagen, thank you.
Jean, recent but very nice blade. Sagen, do you know if this is a recent or "ancient" blade.
In other words, my question was to know if twisted pattern is traditionally accurate.

Regards.

Delor,

the worn out pamor and the worn edges let me think that it is an old blade. The pamor lar gangsir is a pamor what you can find on old/antique keris blades.

Regards,

Detlef

[A. G. Maisey]

Everybody seems to be focussing on whether this is an old --- or "older" --- blade, or a recent blade.

Similarly there seems to be intense interest in the pamor.

Frankly, neither of these things grab my attention.

When a blade looks like this I simply cannot tell from a photo, especially a photo on a computer screen , if it has any age or not.

As for the pamor, this particular pamor is not uncommon in keris from a number of areas.

There are several things which do interest me:-

the gandik, the kembang kacang, the distance from the pesi to the sirah cecak, the form of the pesi, the form of the luk.

If I look at these things I do not see either Lombok or recent Madura.

I tend towards a classification of Madura pre WWII, but I am simply not prepared to give any firm opinion from photos.I doubt Lombok for a classification, but that is a hesitant doubt, it is not a firm statement.

As I have already said:- it is an interesting blade.

[Jean]

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

If I look at these things I do not see either Lombok or recent Madura.

I tend towards a classification of Madura pre WWII, but I am simply not prepared to give any firm opinion from photos.I doubt Lombok for a classification, but that is a hesitant doubt, it is not a firm statement.

As I have already said:- it is an interesting blade.

Hello Mamat,
You have got a positive and controlled opinion, it was difficult to give one for most of us. Is there a sheath for this blade, it could give some clues also if it is an old one?
Best regards
Jean