![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
Hi Cathey,
the Rapier(rapier if >111cm?) looks fine and homogeneous to me. Blade is OK, lack of counter guard and only chisselwork at the show-side is also know on this type of rapier. Gripbinding is probably a replacement?!?! however.... Please do have a close look at the pommel and if the decoration of the pommel has been done by the same tools as the the quillon. the reason I do mention it is that the pommel is of an earlier type and you would expect a pommel shape similar/matching to the quillon finals! (it may be belonging to this piece but it will not surprise me if it is a replacement.) regards from Holland |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 284
|
![]()
Hi Holland?
Under a microscope the grip wire is extremely finely plated and then woven, which would have been a pain to do originally at any time. The Turks heads fit extremely well, and both wire and Turks heads appear of the same age. If it is a replacement they have certainly gone to a lot of trouble. The pommel and hilt decoration appear to be contemporary and quite crude really. Then again I doubt this one was made for a lord so perhaps it’s a poor man’s version, made for use rather than decoration which would explain the great balance the sword has in the hand. Cheers Cathey |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|