Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24th September 2010, 02:37 PM   #1
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
Default

Hi Alan,
the 'gold' like decoration could be 'pinchbeck' an alloy of copper and zinc, used as a cheaper gold substitute. Invented in the 18thC ....its use diminished, in Europe, around mid 19th C. If discovered to be this alloy, it could help date the dagger.

Regards David
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2010, 03:17 PM   #2
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
Default

Yes, I thought possibly pinchbeck, but I doubt that I can get this tested to confirm, so it was safer to say "not gold".

In fact, this has the feel of something with considerable age, but because it is well and truly outside my area of expertise I really don't want to go making comments that could appear to be stupid to somebody with knowledge in this field.
A. G. Maisey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2010, 03:20 PM   #3
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default Interesting item

An interesting dagger.

My thoughts lay in a few places of origins from the Algerian regions to Afghanistan regions. I suggest both because of the horn used, the circle motifs to the quillons, the fretwork to the 'gold' panel in the forte and the type of manufacture, by type I mean the look of the weapon.
If I was to pick one over the other, Algeria would have my money. The quillon shape shown, to me shows Moorish influence of old as does the fretwork panel and he block forte it sits in, if I was to guess the age I would say 1890-1920s....

My 2 cents, lets see what others have to say...

Gav
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010, 08:33 AM   #4
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
Default

Thank you for your opinion Gavin.

Interesting, I would not have considered the areas you mention. I've had a few North African things in the past and this dagger doesn't seem to show similar workmanship, it looks and feels more European to me, but as I've already said, I have very little knowledge in this area, so it could well be North African.

I'll be interested to see if we have any other opinions put forward.

Thanks again.
A. G. Maisey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010, 09:43 AM   #5
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default The look and feel

Just my opinon and I too look forward to further imput but I feel if this was European, my guess is that it wouldn't have the circle motifs to the quillons nor the flattened forte with the panel within, I'd expect to see the same form in Europe but the medial ridge would continue to the hilt...just my thoughts.
Gav
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010, 09:49 AM   #6
Ron Anderson
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
Default

Hi Alan

I believe we've met.

I am going to take a wild, intuitive stab and say this dagger in form reminds me of a Swiss Dagger or Baselard (Schweitzerdegen). Some of them seemed to have had those type of downpointed quillons too.

So it's not too hard for me to see this as European. I agree, I've never seen an African or even an Islamic dagger like this, but then Africa is still largely an unkown to many collectors, including myself.

But I would say it might be European, maybe Swiss, and if so it would be quite old.

That's my best guess.

Regards
Ron
Ron Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010, 09:56 AM   #7
Ron Anderson
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
Default

Hi Gav

I agree the flatened forte with the panel within is a bit strange.

Circle motifs are not uncommon on old German swords. At least, I have one dating to the early 1700s with circle motifs on the quillons and the cup hilt.

Regards
Ron
Ron Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010, 10:18 AM   #8
Ron Anderson
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
Default

The Swiss Dagger was also known as the Holbein Dagger, designed by someone called Hans Holbein. On the link below, you'll find an interesting sketch of the design on the dagger by Hans Holbein in the 16th century. It even shows the dagger with potential down-pointed quillons, and the curves in the hilt displayed in this one. The basic dagger design was later used for the Nazi SA dagger.

The Swiss Dagger had a diamond section double edged blade, as this one looks to have. So all in all, I'd say it's looking to be a pretty strong contender.



http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/exhib...ooms/room4.htm
Ron Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2010, 04:01 PM   #9
fearn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

Hi Ron,

So if you're saying that the blade is 400-500 years old, what do you suggest the non-tarnishing metal on the ricasso is?

Pinchbeck was invented in the 18th century, and I'm not sure it's non-corroding in any case. Red gold?

F
fearn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.