Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 14th September 2010, 12:54 AM   #5
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
Default

Here I disagree with Kai a little. I feel that this is no later than the turn of the century. I have noticed that after that time, the junggayan hilts disappear and the gold plated hilts and lesser quality hilts come into play. Even 1920s pictures of Moro datus sporting these types of kris are actually holding older kris.

I have seen this piece in person and can tell you some things:

1. the ganga is in fact separated, 2. the quality of okir filigree is better than that of later work, 3. blade is not the same as that of the later forms starting after 1915 with sharp luks - this one has smoother rounded luks.

These are some of the other reasons that I place an earlier date on this piece.

I also agree with Maurice in that there were originally silver bands and then silver braided bands on the hilt, though I did not think of silver okir bands - probably depends on where it came from (Maguindanao - okir, Sulu - plain). This piece I would attribute to Sulu.

I also bid on it but......well........ah............

Yes nice piece Charles (grumble, grumble, envy, envy......)
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.