![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 401
|
![]()
Thks BigG for lengthy explanation on combat worthiness of this keris, and Malay/Bugis pieces in general.
Back in the olden days of Majapahit and Demak, Jawanese keris were indeed very effective weapons esp. in close quarter combat. These were described in many babads and kidungs. The difference between Malay and Jawanese fighting styles could be seen from the blade and hilt designs. Malay were more inclined towards stabbing techniques as opposed to Jawanese preferences on slashing/slicing techniques. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello PenangsangII,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 401
|
![]() Quote:
No specific data obtained, the comparison is very general based on own experience in Malay/Bugis fighting style using keris (yes, the art is still alive in this part of the world) and Jawanese keris fighting style was based from several babads / kidungs. Slashing here doesnt mean cutting the opponent using the entire keris edge, slashes were made at the pucuk part of the keris (whisking/ light sweeping movement). The targets were usually opponent's neck, belly or anywhere we could lay eyes on) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|