![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
Looking at the up-close photo, I will stand myself corrected. This was no sand paper. It was a belt-grinder and sand-paper.
There are two options here for me. 1. The threaded tang indicates that this blade was mated to a pommel that was not original to it. In other words, this blade was recently taken off a composite sword. The blade decorations may have been refreshed and re-cut. We see that in the antique firearms market. 2. The other explanation for a threaded tang is that the blade is 19th century, from an old style officer's sword-rapier, like an Austrian infantry sword, or a British household cavalry dress sword, both from the first quarter of the 1800s. Blades of this style were in vogue with the upper echelons of the officer class for a short time, and were produced to imitate the earlier styles. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
|
![]()
Thanks again to everybody.
Frankly, one of my first assumptions was it could be an Austrian civil servant sword for ceremonies. Does the scabbard in no way help ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
I think it has been ground.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
|
![]()
Hi Manuel,
thanks for your remarks, but in my opinion the blade has to be related to an XIX cent. environment. In this case the scabbard (which fits perfectly) could be considered as proper. The blade is shorter and thicker if compared to that of a XVII cent. rapier (see my very first pic), and also the conditions of the blade makes me suppose of a not too long life. Best regards to all cooperating friends. GIO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|