Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd June 2010, 12:33 AM   #1
Berkley
Member
 
Berkley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas USA
Posts: 257
Default

British (primarily British Indian) manufacture of kukris in large quantities was a 20th century phenomenon necessitated by the large number of Gurkhas who served in both World Wars. The extremely rare "kukri" bayonets were genuine Nepalese ethnographic weapons produced in the 19th century.
From Guns of the Gurkhas by John Walter:
Quote:
[T]he chupi bayonets (the so-called 'kukri bayonets')...have attained a notoriety that was completely disproportionate to their numbers.... Variations in detail suggest that the bayonets were made individually, over a considerable period of time.... Most have the suggestion of a 'T'-back, occasionally with narrow fullers immediately beneath the back. The sockets have 'L'-slots and East India Company-type springs...that enabled most of the bayonets to fit a selection of Nepalese-made...barrels. This reveals that they date from the flintlock era. However, the socket diameters varied...and it would have been necessary to match individual bayonets to individual muskets...

Quote:
When Jang Bahadur left to visit Britain late in 1850, at least one witness testified that the prime minister had 'stepped into the verandah overlooking the garden [of his lodgings in Calcutta], on the broad path of which a long line of bright and terrible bayonets (shaped like the Kookree, or Nepaulese knife - a very handsome carved [sic] weapon glittered in the sun...' This confirms that the men of the escort were carrying Windus-type flintlock muskets and chupi bayonets, but it is believed that only a handful of battalions were equipped with them.
Berkley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2010, 04:16 PM   #2
Bryan.H
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
Default

I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing you mean, but I saw this on Fagan's site a while ago. I've never seen one in museums or books before.

18TH CENTURY INDIAN BAYONET, SANGIN, FOR MATCHLOCK MUSKET





http://faganarms.com/recently_sold.aspx
Bryan.H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2010, 04:31 PM   #3
Bryan.H
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
Default And now for something completely different!!!

The Zombie killer!

Bryan.H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2010, 04:58 PM   #4
Aleksey G.
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 70
Default

Guys, thank you for your posts, pretty cool stuff.
Does zombie killer run on gas? doesnt seem like there is a lot of gastank there.
actually now I see some wiring so probably a battery
************************
It doesn seem like there is a lot of information out there on ethnographic bayonets, or even just ehnograhic blades being afixed on the rifles.
I was hoping for some juicy pictures of moro krisses, yataghans, or maybe even an occasional afgani khyber knife crudely afixed on the rifles
Aleksey G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2010, 05:32 PM   #5
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
Default

Getting back to the question, as we all know, material on ethnographic weapons is in itself challenging to find, let alone discussion on the use of the bayonet or attaching ethnographic edged weapons to gun blades in this manner. I think it is important to remember that for the most part, the use of firearms was a European developed situation militarily (despite the obviously well known circumstances of early development in China etc.). In this same context came the use of the bayonet with the use of the gun.

In most ethnographic cases in colonial conflicts, native warriors primary weapons were edged weapons, bow and arrow, spears etc. These were of course weapons readily available, did not require ammunition or powder, nor was training in thier use typically present. Naturally, there was a distinct awareness of the advantages of firearms, and efforts were made to acquire these weapons, as shown by capture of Remington guns by the Mahdists in the Sudan.
In most cases ethnographically, where firearms were indeed used, the use of secondary weapons such as yataghans, daggers and various sidearms were independant of the firearm, which would have been seen as an encumbrance when using the other weapons. There were no drills for bayonet type fighting, so these would not have been so applied.
In Arabia, the use of matchlock guns is known to have been traditionally maintained into the 20th century by the Bedouins, but as far as I know, there are no known examples of bayonets or weapons used as such. The sword in much of Bedouin warfare, remained a primary weapon for combat late into the century despite the use of the matchlock in a tactical sense.

In the case of the Indian matchlock bayonets, these are indeed mentioned in books (Elgood, p.165); Egerton #353 and a Wallis & Wallis sale in 2003 had one with red and white horsehair plume. Tipu Sultan's forces are known to have had some of these, decorated much in his fashion. It should be pointed out that these seem to have developed from European contact with EIC forces, and emulating the use of bayonets on thier guns.

Excellent post Berkeley!!! on the Nepalese 'chupi' , and again, these were developed in response to exposure to British military drill, and while they are 'ethnographic' in the sense that they are exclusive to these Gurkha units, they are produced in military fashion using the L lock and EIC type springs.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.