![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Thank you, Bluelake. Probably the quality and purity of the ingredientss (sources) in the 16th C would not have been the highest. So, we are left with BP that was effectively less powerful than what was available in the 18th C.
Best Manuel Quote:
Last edited by fernando; 8th June 2010 at 03:21 PM. Reason: Inconvenient path |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 535
|
![]()
Hi Nando,
Are there any areas on the barrel that can point towards a later alteration like an iron fixing band (leaving a lighter surface area?) It is interesting to think about how and where that tiller broke off/was sawn off. And what would have happened next. Beautyfull example of an early hand cannon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Marcus,
This pattern is consistent with another one sold in some auction a few years ago. Only the length in such one is shorter. The text in the offer mentioned a 'quadrangular cascabel' and not a 'cut off tiller'. So at facing both examples, we don't have as a fact that, this is short tiller was meant to be like that from the beginning. ... or was there a generalized habit to cut them off for some modified purpose ![]() . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 60
|
![]()
data of the gun: ca. 22kg ,102.6 cm overall, tiller 18.8 cm doesn't look cut off or alterd. calibre: ca. 38mm. greetings iskender switzerland
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|