![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,730
|
Thank you guys for this valuable discussion.
I have this example which has been neglected in research for decades, and have always simply presumed it was English, and probably of c. 1690s. In reading these entries, I am curious if my presumption was anywhere near correct. I hope with the knowledge apparent here for either confirmation or more informed observations. Its rough, I know, but I tend to leave examples unrestored. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 444
|
Hi Jim ,
not saying it could not be Englisch, but the type style and form are typical French between 1750 and 1780 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,730
|
Thank you Dirk! Then perhaps even tenuous possibility of Culloden (1746) association in degree (by type) as there were some French contingents there as Jacobites. Were turks heads used on grips that late?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
There was a cross-pollination between the Jacobins and the French, in the 18th century the French King had Jacobins in his personal guard with typical Scottish Basket hilt swords with some a blade with "Vive Le Roy" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 444
|
all with turkisch knots :the first is French Model 1734 , the second Louis XV 1750 and the third is ca 1770
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|