Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th October 2025, 11:28 AM   #1
werecow
Member
 
werecow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 617
Default

Thanks Radboud! Time to practice mon français (even if it does not resolve this particular discussion).

EDIT: Also, interesting that this one has a TOLEDO(?) inscription and simple holes iso stars in the guard plates.

Last edited by werecow; 16th October 2025 at 06:00 PM.
werecow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2025, 11:09 AM   #2
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 439
Default Walloon

It has to do with economy and profit; these swords were easier to produce in large quantities and thus suitable for sale.
They were very versatile swords, practical and useful in many circumstances by both infantry and cavalry, etc. The Walloon sword remained in use for over 100 years, primarily in the Netherlands, Germany, and France, and also has many variants. Many have withstood the test of time, but in most, the plates in the guard rings have disappeared.
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2025, 12:02 PM   #3
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,646
Default English? walloon?

Thank you guys for this valuable discussion.
I have this example which has been neglected in research for decades, and have always simply presumed it was English, and probably of c. 1690s.
In reading these entries, I am curious if my presumption was anywhere near correct.
I hope with the knowledge apparent here for either confirmation or more informed observations.
Its rough, I know, but I tend to leave examples unrestored.
Attached Images
     
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2025, 12:26 PM   #4
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 439
Default walloon

Hi Jim ,
not saying it could not be Englisch, but the type style and form are typical French between 1750 and 1780
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2025, 01:18 PM   #5
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ulfberth View Post
Hi Jim ,
not saying it could not be Englisch, but the type style and form are typical French between 1750 and 1780
Thank you Dirk! Then perhaps even tenuous possibility of Culloden (1746) association in degree (by type) as there were some French contingents there as Jacobites. Were turks heads used on grips that late?
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2025, 03:10 PM   #6
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall View Post
Thank you Dirk! Then perhaps even tenuous possibility of Culloden (1746) association in degree (by type) as there were some French contingents there as Jacobites. Were turks heads used on grips that late?
Turkish knots were still in use on some officers swords, on troopers mostly wire or solid brass hilts, here is a French model 1734. The first French model with a brass hilt is as early as 1680 but it has a single guard plate.
There was a cross-pollination between the Jacobins and the French, in the 18th century the French King had Jacobins in his personal guard with typical Scottish Basket hilt swords with some a blade with "Vive Le Roy"
Attached Images
 
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2025, 01:04 AM   #7
Radboud
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall View Post
Were turks heads used on grips that late?
Most definitely, the French Epee d’officier d’infanterie m1767 has a faux Turks head on the grip, and I have a French silver hilted smallsword with them that's hallmarked to 1760.
Radboud is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2025, 11:07 AM   #8
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 439
Default

all with turkisch knots :the first is French Model 1734 , the second Louis XV 1750 and the third is ca 1770
Attached Images
   
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2025, 08:37 PM   #9
Radboud
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by werecow View Post
EDIT: Also, interesting that this one has a TOLEDO(?) inscription and simple holes iso stars in the guard plates.
There are several other subtle flaws with this example that lead me to suspect it's been restored. As you observe, the pattern of the piercings plus the missing star detail on the holes makes it likely that the plates are replacements.

Furthermore, the pommel shape is off, and it's missing some of the finer details again. Plus, the point where the knuckle bow is joined to the pommel is recessed, something I haven't seen on any originals.

On the TOL inscription, this isn't surprising; a lot of these and other swords for this region have spurious Spanish markings (the most obvious being the Sahagum) and given the history Spain has here, you'd expect their sword smiths to be associated with quality, much like Andreara Ferrara in the British Isles.
Radboud is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.