![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
|
![]() Quote:
http://bdh-rd.bne.es/viewer.vm?id=0000052132&page=1 Searching in connection with this new version I found that according to at least one 16th century Wappenbuch, the coat of arms seen in some of the versions was attributed to Osman I. I am quite sure that this should not be taken literally, but instead symbolizes the transfer of authority from the Byzantines to the Ottomans. http://www.hubert-herald.nl/ByzantiumArms.htm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Romania
Posts: 314
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Romania
Posts: 314
|
![]()
Here's another example how depictions get reused over time.
1 Báthory Zsigmond and George I Rákóczi. https://ro.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiși...gmond_1596.jpg https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...II_Rakoczy.jpg 2 Michael the Brave and Gheorghe Ștefan https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...i_Viteazul.jpg https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...and_02_311.jpg ======================== Also, another example of that wool hat that Wallachians are depicted with. Portrait of Michael the Brave. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...i_Viteazul.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Romania
Posts: 314
|
![]()
Here's another example of the same depiction used for two different people, Bathory Istvan and False Dmitry I.
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...33_-_1586).jpg https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...ump-to-license |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Romania
Posts: 314
|
![]()
This just gets weirder and weirder.
1 - two Michael the Brave portraits combined to give on Andrei Movilă/Andrzej Mohyła. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...i_Viteazul.jpg https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...aiViteazul.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...rij_Mohyla.jpg 2 - how about this portrait of Bethlen Gabor (see attached picture), which is actually another portrait of Michael the Brave. Although this likely is a more modern mistaken identity. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki..._Viteazul).png Last edited by Teisani; 24th January 2023 at 08:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Romania
Posts: 314
|
![]()
Last examples:
1 - Gabor Bethlen with and without hat. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...d_01_439_2.jpg https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...d_01_437_2.jpg 2 - Bocskai István with and without sabre. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ay-istvan1.jpg https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki...re_bocskai.jpg After seeing all of this, I now have a healthy dose of scepticism when looking at these old depictions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Perhaps, the most informative source of old Hungarian swords is the so-called Kepes Kronica, " The illustrates chronic", a book written in ~1370 on the order of a Hungarian King Louis ( Lajos) I. It shows a variety of Hungarian armamentarium at that time: a co-existence of both European and Oriental swords.
The very first illustration shows the king sitting on the throne and surrounded by the local aristocracy. On his right side ( our left) are definitely European knights wearing typical European armour and carrying straight swords. Those are the European warriors serving him and coming from different Christian principalities including France: Louis I belonged to Angevine dynasty. But on his left ( our right) are several swarthy, bearded and mustachioed individuals wearing long Oriental robes and carrying curved sabers. Those are the Cumans ( Quipchaks) who came to Hungary after 1237, escaping the onslaught of the Batu Khan’s Golden Horde on Eastern and Central Europe. Last edited by ariel; 27th January 2023 at 03:27 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|