![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 189
|
![]()
The first one was hall marked but I can't remember what the date was. I think it was in the range 1810-20. The second is dateable by the maker to 1813-17. Just to further emphasize how difficult your task to pin your sword to a particular regiment is, here is a mameluke in my collection marked to a Grenadier officer in the 45th regiment of foot circa 1811/12. It has a steel scabbard, but who is to say it didn't also have a leather scabbard for dress wear? I have seen this same type of hilt on several examples marked to cavalry officers. You are right in that the style of the scabbard bands on your sword are similar to those found on several examples marked to Lancer regiments, but there are also plenty of examples of other swords marked to Lancer regiments, with different styles of scabbard bands and hilts. Also the examples of lancer marked swords with the same scabbard bands as yours that I have seen, also have the same design on the cross guard, which yours doesn't. I am not saying that your sword didn't belong to a Lancer officer, it certainly could have, but it could also have belonged to an officer of any number of other regiments.
Cheers, Bryce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 52
|
![]()
Fair points. At this point I think we can only break it down into knowns, possibilities and unknowns:
Known: ivory handle, ottoman blade 16-17th century by characteristics Possibility: made pre 1822 regulation due to leather scabbard, Lancers by designs on scabbard Unknown: maker of blade, maker of sheath I think the designs on the scabbard NOT being found on anything other Lancers swords is semi-evidence of Lancer ownership. The regulation about scabbard material also points to pre-1822. Incredible sword, was hoping to find more sources but doesn’t seem to be a ton on these anywhere. Dellars companion volume is in the mail. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,235
|
![]()
Bryce, I love that pipeback sword with the feathered tip!
I recall Prosser made similar wide pipebacks for officers in the very early 19c. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 189
|
![]()
I just found this image in my files. I don't know the source. It appears to have a Persian shamshir blade and the cross guard and scabbard bands associated with lancers.
G'day Kronckew, The 45th regiment mameluke is by Prosser. Here is a shot of two quillpoints in my collection. The bottom celtic hilt is also marked to Prosser, while the mameluke is unmarked. Cheers, Bryce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the wee woods north of Napanee Ontario
Posts: 395
|
![]()
Great Celtic hilt. I know someone who recently found one but won't part with it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 38
|
![]()
Here is a Infantry Officer Mameluke 1815-1817 thats how long the furbisher was around for so its easy to date.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|