![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
Is this piece antique ; i.e. 100 years old ?
![]() Somehow this doesn't look like a real fighting piece . I would think that the attached tab would seriously hurt the hand if the katar was actually used . http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7424558672 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
![]()
This is certainly a newly made piece, identifiable by the stereotype damascus birdeye pattern, and the koftgari. However, it is nice
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
No doubt: very, very new...
But in the same vein: I always had doubts about the real use of the unfolding katars(you know, when you press the bars together, the blade opens up in 3 segments). The only solid blade (central) becomes totally hidden and useless. I suspect all of them started as 19th century bazaar pieces for the dumb "farangi". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]()
Rick and I talked by PM about this piece before it sold. We both thought the dating was off by a few centuries. Quite an attractive piece but not old. The price surprised me a little given the obvious newness of this one.
Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
Very, very, very stereotipic modern kofgari and eyed damascus. Nicely made thou.
ehm, the price ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|