| 
 
			
			Thanks for the clear pictures!Iam sorry but no matter how much you want to believe it, it is sure to be a later reproduction and not an original mace.
 the faint lines and very low quality of the fleur de lis in your pictures clearly show that it is a casting and no chiselling in relief.
 The mace from the berlinerzeughaus inv. nr4453 you posted,  is of a totally different category, high quality carving and etching and non comparable to the coarse casting/workmanship of your mace.
 
 hereby also attached some pictures how a 16th-century mace should look.
 
 Best,
 
				 Last edited by cornelistromp; 9th August 2014 at 11:45 AM.
 |