Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12th August 2024, 07:49 PM   #1
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default An interesting Bali keris for sharing

Just want to show you a Bali keris just sold here in Germany. !5 luk, 70,5 cm overall, blade 46,4 cm.
Attached Images
            
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2024, 07:51 PM   #2
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default

More pics.
Attached Images
    
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2024, 11:46 AM   #3
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

I have seen a similar one in China.
Attached Images
     
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2024, 11:48 AM   #4
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajen View Post
Just want to show you a Bali keris just sold here in Germany. !5 luk, 70,5 cm overall, blade 46,4 cm.
Hello Sajen,

Can you reveal to us how much does that one sold? purely interested.(is this kind of question allowed in the forum?)
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2024, 06:05 PM   #5
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughChen View Post
I have seen a similar one in China.
The only thing that is similar in this keris you saw in China is the hilt. The rest of this keris (blade and sheath) is Javanese and this is a mismatched ensemble, possibly thrown together by an uninformed dealer or collector.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2024, 06:16 PM   #6
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,107
Default

Detlef, it's a bit too dirty to tell in the photos, but, do you think the sheath material her is ivory?
Its seems like a nice keris that needs a little bit of TLC.
I have one with a similar dhapur (though mine is 11 luk). Luk are less deep on mine with a wider blade, but all the same ricikan at the base of there blade. Also a similar "Bayu" hulu, but a completely different style sarung.
Attached Images
     
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2024, 06:24 PM   #7
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughChen View Post
Can you reveal to us how much does that one sold? purely interested.(is this kind of question allowed in the forum?)
We try not to discuss prices on the forum whenever possible.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2024, 07:21 PM   #8
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughChen View Post
Hello Sajen,

Can you reveal to us how much does that one sold? purely interested.(is this kind of question allowed in the forum?)
Hi HC,

No, it's not allowed to discuss prices at this place!

Best regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2024, 07:34 PM   #9
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
Detlef, it's a bit too dirty to tell in the photos, but, do you think the sheath material her is ivory?
Its seems like a nice keris that needs a little bit of TLC.
I have one with a similar dhapur (though mine is 11 luk). Luk are less deep on mine with a wider blade, but all the same ricikan at the base of there blade. Also a similar "Bayu" hulu, but a completely different style sarung.
Hello David,

I was the second highest bidder on this keris. It was rather cheap but sadly I am not able to bid higher for the moment. And yes, I guess that the cross piece is from ivory, at least I don't see any bubble you can see by some fake hilts from some sort of plastic we all have seen before and the overall condition and materials let me think that all is old and original, late 19th to early 20th century would be my guess. Sadly most of the gold wash is gone.
And yes, this keris needs some TLC.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2024, 03:28 AM   #10
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajen View Post
Hi HC,

No, it's not allowed to discuss prices at this place!

Best regards,
Detlef
Thank you for reminding !
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2024, 03:34 AM   #11
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajen View Post
Hello David,

I was the second highest bidder on this keris. It was rather cheap but sadly I am not able to bid higher for the moment. And yes, I guess that the cross piece is from ivory, at least I don't see any bubble you can see by some fake hilts from some sort of plastic we all have seen before and the overall condition and materials let me think that all is old and original, late 19th to early 20th century would be my guess. Sadly most of the gold wash is gone.
And yes, this keris needs some TLC.

Regards,
Detlef
Hello all,
Is this hlit also ivory? It's not as dark.
Attached Images
     
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2024, 06:30 PM   #12
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughChen View Post
Hello all,
Is this hlit also ivory? It's not as dark.
I don't think that it's elephant ivory but not certain about the material. I would need to handle it.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2024, 10:33 PM   #13
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajen View Post

Hello David,

I was the second highest bidder on this keris. It was rather cheap but sadly I am not able to bid higher for the moment. And yes, I guess that the cross piece is from ivory, at least I don't see any bubble you can see by some fake hilts from some sort of plastic we all have seen before and the overall condition and materials let me think that all is old and original, late 19th to early 20th century would be my guess. Sadly most of the gold wash is gone.
And yes, this keris needs some TLC.

Regards,
Detlef
Detlef,

I doubt such carvings in th crosspiece were done until WWII, but when they were done, sometimes on old ivory crosspieces. I don't particularly like this kind of things, but that goes together with how "traditional" art developed in Bali.

If we compare blades of this Keris and David's, I would say, David's is easily four, five times more worth.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th August 2024, 12:07 AM   #14
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav View Post
Detlef,

I doubt such carvings in th crosspiece were done until WWII, but when they were done, sometimes on old ivory crosspieces. I don't particularly like this kind of things, but that goes together with how "traditional" art developed in Bali.

If we compare blades of this Keris and David's, I would say, David's is easily four, five times more worth.
Hello,Gustav

Why don't you like it?
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th August 2024, 09:41 AM   #15
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughChen;292688

Hello,Gustav

Why don't you like it?
Hugh,

the quick answer would be - because of my personal taste.

The somewhat longer one - I doubt, somebody interested primarily in Bali, how it was before 1908, when the order changed, would like this kind of ivory crosspiece carving.

If somebody, who has visited Bali in recent times, would have chance to visit Bali around 1900, he most probably would be astonished, how much of "traditional" Bali is missing - music, dances, stone and wood carvings. All of this did exist back in this time of course, yet in a completely different style and with completely different expression.

On the other hand, this style of crosspiece carving is a genuine part of Balinese art of, let's say, 1950 - 1965, as such it is completely acceptable and genuine. It is kind of "aristocratic" version of the dancer's Keris.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=dance+keris

For anybody interested in changes of Balinese society and art during the XX century, I recommend the book by Hildred Geertz, "The Life of a Balinese Temple. Artistry, Imagination, and history in a Peasant Village".
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th August 2024, 11:28 AM   #16
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav View Post
Hugh,

the quick answer would be - because of my personal taste.

The somewhat longer one - I doubt, somebody interested primarily in Bali, how it was before 1908, when the order changed, would like this kind of ivory crosspiece carving.

If somebody, who has visited Bali in recent times, would have chance to visit Bali around 1900, he most probably would be astonished, how much of "traditional" Bali is missing - music, dances, stone and wood carvings. All of this did exist back in this time of course, yet in a completely different style and with completely different expression.

On the other hand, this style of crosspiece carving is a genuine part of Balinese art of, let's say, 1950 - 1965, as such it is completely acceptable and genuine. It is kind of "aristocratic" version of the dancer's Keris.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=dance+keris

For anybody interested in changes of Balinese society and art during the XX century, I recommend the book by Hildred Geertz, "The Life of a Balinese Temple. Artistry, Imagination, and history in a Peasant Village".
Thank you, Gustav! I can learn a lot from your answer. I just visited Bali just last month, a beautiful place! I also visited a Keris museum called Neka Art Museum. But all Keris there seems new and not very attracting to me.
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2024, 03:06 PM   #17
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav View Post
Detlef,

I doubt such carvings in th crosspiece were done until WWII, but when they were done, sometimes on old ivory crosspieces. I don't particularly like this kind of things, but that goes together with how "traditional" art developed in Bali.

If we compare blades of this Keris and David's, I would say, David's is easily four, five times more worth.
Hello Gustav,

I agree with you that the keris from David is the better one and when I would get the chance to choose one I would take the one from David.
But my intention was to show this keris and not to compare it with others.
A similar one was shown in the publication shown in the pic.
I think that this style appears in the sec. quarter of the 20th century and is a legit type of Balinese keris style.

Regards,
Detlef
Attached Images
  
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2024, 04:19 PM   #18
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

All are very attracting Keris, very rare. If I found one, I would definitely try to have it.
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2024, 04:58 PM   #19
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

But that blade looks very old in it's condition.
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2024, 06:25 PM   #20
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,246
Default

Detlef,

just, when David posted his Keris noting the similarities, my fingers itched to disclose the differences, sorry for that!

The sheath from publication is similar only in that the crosspiece also is carved in this horror vacui manner. Material, sheath form, carving style are completely different and even later then the initial Keris of this thread - made quite unlikely before the 1980ties. The dress age attributions in this publication are sometimes quite adventurous, and were even more adventurous in lot descriptions of the auction, where some of the items published were sold.

Legit style - of course, for it's time.
Before WWII - maybe, in my opinion rather not.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2024, 07:32 PM   #21
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajen View Post
I agree with you that the keris from David is the better one and when I would get the chance to choose one I would take the one from David.
But my intention was to show this keris and not to compare it with others.
A similar one was shown in the publication shown in the pic.
I think that this style appears in the sec. quarter of the 20th century and is a legit type of Balinese keris style.
Just to be clear, my own intention in showing my example in this thread was not to show a "better" example, but rather a similar dhapur, as well as a similar hilt.
Detlef, i believe i am more inclined to agree with Gustav that your sheath is probably more likely post WWII. The blade, of course, is older than that. I would also have pegged the example you show from publication above to also be post WWII. I don't believe that make it illegitimate as a Balinese style, but it seems more recent to me.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2024, 08:26 PM   #22
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
Just to be clear, my own intention in showing my example in this thread was not to show a "better" example, but rather a similar dhapur, as well as a similar hilt.
Detlef, i believe i am more inclined to agree with Gustav that your sheath is probably more likely post WWII. The blade, of course, is older than that. I would also have pegged the example you show from publication above to also be post WWII. I don't believe that make it illegitimate as a Balinese style, but it seems more recent to me.
Hello David,

I was well aware of why you showed your keris and am grateful to you for it.
The gandik area is actually almost the same, the difference is the number of luk.
However, I think that the keris I have shown has a significantly older sheath than the one in the IFICA publication, especially if it's actually ivory. I am not the new owner of this keris. I just wanted to show it.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2024, 09:01 PM   #23
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav View Post
Detlef,

just, when David posted his Keris noting the similarities, my fingers itched to disclose the differences, sorry for that!

The sheath from publication is similar only in that the crosspiece also is carved in this horror vacui manner. Material, sheath form, carving style are completely different and even later then the initial Keris of this thread - made quite unlikely before the 1980ties. The dress age attributions in this publication are sometimes quite adventurous, and were even more adventurous in lot descriptions of the auction, where some of the items published were sold.

Legit style - of course, for it's time.
Before WWII - maybe, in my opinion rather not.
No problem Gustav!
As I said, I just wanted to show the piece and I am fully aware that the cross piece of the keris in question are probably not actually antique and that the piece in the IFICAH publication is significantly younger than the one shown. If it is indeed from ivory, it is certainly a valuable piece, even if the quality of the carving is not the best. We all know now that you don't like this type of scabbard/sarung.
I personally would be quite happy if I had a piece like the scabbards shown from "Keris Bali Bersejarah" on page 114. Of course, the quality of the carving cannot really be compared.

Regards,
Detlef
Attached Images
 
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2024, 11:10 PM   #24
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,246
Default

Detlef,

this kind of carved crosspiece actually lets me quite indefferent, because it is outside of my area of interest. What upsets me, is, when somebody says, it is "late 19th to early 20th century".
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2024, 05:06 PM   #25
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajen View Post
I don't think that it's elephant ivory but not certain about the material. I would need to handle it.

Regards,
Detlef
Thank you Sajen. I think it's deer antler. But I cannot ID if it's sambar antlers or American moose antlers.
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2024, 10:00 PM   #26
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughChen View Post
Thank you Sajen. I think it's deer antler. But I cannot ID if it's sambar antlers or American moose antlers.
For me it does not have the appearance of moose antler, which has become a popular carving material in Bali in recent years. Frankly it looks more like bone to me, but i would have to see sharper, more detailed photos to be sure. But it appears to have some porous areas that could indicate bone.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2024, 02:57 AM   #27
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
For me it does not have the appearance of moose antler, which has become a popular carving material in Bali in recent years. Frankly it looks more like bone to me, but i would have to see sharper, more detailed photos to be sure. But it appears to have some porous areas that could indicate bone.
Thank you David! Here are some detailed photos. Since it's quite impossible to identify the age of this Keris through it's blade, I think maybe the estimate work can start with the hilt. Maybe the material of hilt can give a hint to the age of this Balinese Keris which was asserted by the former owner that it's more than 200 even300 hundred years old.

we can find porous areas in his left arm , four holes in the back of his head. But the porous areas are not evenly distributed, but concentrated in the center, which indicated antlers I believe.

since the moose came from north part of the world, if the material is moose, then the hilt may not be too old!
Attached Images
      
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2024, 03:26 AM   #28
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughChen View Post
Since it's quite impossible to identify the age of this Keris through it's blade, I think maybe the estimate work can start with the hilt. Maybe the material of hilt can give a hint to the age of this Balinese Keris which was asserted by the former owner that it's more than 200 even300 hundred years old.

we can find porous areas in his left arm , four holes in the back of his head. But the porous areas are not evenly distributed, but concentrated in the center, which indicated antlers I believe.

since the moose came from north part of the world, if the material is moose, then the hilt may not be too old!
Thanks for the better photos. If nothing else they do seem to rule out ivory as the material.
I am afraid that an estimate of the age of the hilt is no help whatsoever in determining the age of the blade. Hilts come and go and there is no telling when this ensemble came together. That said i doubt the hilt is much older than a century. From what i can see i would still say it is probably bone. If the hilt could be removed from the blade and photographed from the bottom we might have a more definitive answer.
Obviously we cannot judge the exact age of a blade, but i doubt yours is as old as 300 years. This blade seems most likely top fall somewhere into the 19th century.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2024, 03:39 AM   #29
HughChen
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: China
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
Thanks for the better photos. If nothing else they do seem to rule out ivory as the material.
I am afraid that an estimate of the age of the hilt is no help whatsoever in determining the age of the blade. Hilts come and go and there is no telling when this ensemble came together. That said i doubt the hilt is much older than a century. From what i can see i would still say it is probably bone. If the hilt could be removed from the blade and photographed from the bottom we might have a more definitive answer.
Obviously we cannot judge the exact age of a blade, but i doubt yours is as old as 300 years. This blade seems most likely top fall somewhere into the 19th century.
Thank you David, it seems that the hilt is glued to the blade. And my friend told me that he kept it for 30 years and the hilt has never been removed.

Last edited by HughChen; 23rd August 2024 at 04:58 AM.
HughChen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.