Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26th May 2012, 05:01 AM   #1
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default Rembrandt's Kris (?)

OK, now is the hard part :-)
Here is a famous Rembrandt's self -portait with a dagger. Usually it is described as a "Kris"
But... The width is strange, the tip presupposes the existence of a Turkish yelman, the gangya is peculiar and the luks are only on one side.
We cannot say that Rembrandt was a lousy or an inattentive painter. So, what kind of keris did he have, and was it a kris at all?

With a long weekend ahead, there is plenty of time to ponder the mystery:-)
Attached Images
 
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2012, 07:54 AM   #2
drdavid
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 369
Default

This topic has been explored somewhat a few times before for example:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ight=rembrandt
drdavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2012, 11:32 AM   #3
Lew
(deceased)
 
Lew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariel
OK, now is the hard part :-)
Here is a famous Rembrandt's self -portait with a dagger. Usually it is described as a "Kris"
But... The width is strange, the tip presupposes the existence of a Turkish yelman, the gangya is peculiar and the luks are only on one side.
We cannot say that Rembrandt was a lousy or an inattentive painter. So, what kind of keris did he have, and was it a kris at all?

With a long weekend ahead, there is plenty of time to ponder the mystery:-)
Looks like some type of sudang from Moro land
Lew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2012, 05:06 PM   #4
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,012
Default

Ariel, i do see why you question this particular drawing, but as you can see from some of the other paintings that he did, he clearly is depicting a keris in some of those and i believe he is known to have had more than one in his personal collection. The blade in this drawing may or may not have been have been derived from one of his keris and i think it is also important to remember that these are paintings and drawings, not photographs, and artists will adapt, bend and change "reality" for their own artistic purposes. It is possible that he simply took certain elements for the keris form to create a completely nonexistent fantasy blade for this drawing that is only loosely based upon the keris. I am afraid that we will never know for sure.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2012, 06:17 AM   #5
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,259
Smile

Ariel, I don't think those are Luks; I believe they are folds/wrinkles in Rembrandt's jacket .

As for the sword ?
Looks a bit like a Keris Buda on steroids .

I think there is artistic license at work here .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2012, 01:50 PM   #6
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

Rick,
Look at the first and second luks: they are not even touching the jacket.
I also do not think we should write it off as artistic license: Rembrandt was very precise. Look at his rendition of the Ceylonese Patisthanaya in the "Blinding of Samson", and the kris in the same pic: one can easily see the structure of the handle ( Balinese?).
I am sure he had a weapon we just cannot recognize easily, but Rembrandt must have been onto something. This was not a quick recollection of something he had seen earlier for a moment and filled the memory gaps: he actually posed for this picture.
I am intrigued.
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2012, 04:56 PM   #7
Henk
Member
 
Henk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
Default

Ariel, I think Rick is right. If Rembrandt was so precise in his drawings and paintings as you say, can you explain to me where the luks on the other side of the blade are? If you look at the pommel of the handle it could be a Moro kris as well. Rembrandt was by the way well known for his collection weapons from the Orient.
Henk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2012, 09:09 PM   #8
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariel
I also do not think we should write it off as artistic license: Rembrandt was very precise.
Rembrandt was, IMHO, a brilliant painter. But his painting style is highly romanticized. It is not photo-realism in style. He used his imagination quite a bit in his work and i don't think that we can accept the depictions of the weapons in his work as being exactly as the models themselves looked. If we look carefully at the gonjo of the Blinding of Samson painting he has clearly added extra curvature which would most probably not be present of on his actual keris. It is one of the great advantages painting has over photography as an art form (though not quite so anymore with photoshop ).
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.