Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12th June 2005, 05:47 AM   #1
jmings
Member
 
jmings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tebbetts, Missouri, USA
Posts: 49
Default Indian SLOs - Right?

There is no reason for me to preserve these are there?
Otherwise, I plan to de-rust and replace the handles.
Oh, yeah and bend the tips back - they're both bent over in a U.
Attached Images
    
jmings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 08:00 AM   #2
Montino Bourbon
Member
 
Montino Bourbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Posts: 295
Default

What is an SLO?
Montino Bourbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 09:17 AM   #3
jmings
Member
 
jmings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tebbetts, Missouri, USA
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Montino Bourbon
What is an SLO?
Sword Like Object also known as wallhanger i.e. something that looks like a sword but is non-functional to the point of being dangerous, in some cases, to the user and nearby people and housepets.
jmings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 02:43 PM   #4
M.carter
Member
 
M.carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 176
Default

The second one, yes. The first one, it depends, if its threaded, then it probably is an SLO, if the blade stuck to the hilt (which is historically accurate), then it probably deserves to be called a 'sword'.

Anyway, I find Indian SLO's of this kind to be quite good. The blade is good, as a beater anyway. The problem is with the tangs. You can regrind the tangs, starting from the forte so that you would have a better tang, then refix it onto the hilt. There you go, you have a good, shortened beater.
M.carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 02:56 PM   #5
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M.carter
The second one, yes. The first one, it depends, if its threaded, then it probably is an SLO, if the blade stuck to the hilt (which is historically accurate), then it probably deserves to be called a 'sword'.

Anyway, I find Indian SLO's of this kind to be quite good. The blade is good, as a beater anyway. The problem is with the tangs. You can regrind the tangs, starting from the forte so that you would have a better tang, then refix it onto the hilt. There you go, you have a good, shortened beater.

BUT WHY BOTHER ?
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 03:37 PM   #6
M.carter
Member
 
M.carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariel
BUT WHY BOTHER ?
You're right ariel.
M.carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 09:33 PM   #7
jmings
Member
 
jmings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tebbetts, Missouri, USA
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M.carter
The second one, yes. The first one, it depends, if its threaded, then it probably is an SLO, if the blade stuck to the hilt (which is historically accurate), then it probably deserves to be called a 'sword'.

Anyway, I find Indian SLO's of this kind to be quite good. The blade is good, as a beater anyway. The problem is with the tangs. You can regrind the tangs, starting from the forte so that you would have a better tang, then refix it onto the hilt. There you go, you have a good, shortened beater.
You are saying that the second sword with the green trifoil on the handle is worth preserving? What should I do to preserve it? Thank you.

I was pretty sure that the one with the red scabbard and easter-egg plastic ball for a handle would be OK to modify.
jmings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 09:50 PM   #8
M.carter
Member
 
M.carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 176
Default

I do not know what you mean by preserving, anyway they are probably both SLO's, if not for their hilts, then for the blades (rolled, unhardened steel).

Considering they are both new, how would you preserve them anyway?
M.carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2005, 06:06 PM   #9
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,742
Default

Right thats it, this site is the DB's Ask Lew.
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.