Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 9th November 2014, 09:23 PM   #1
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default Interesting WW2 Philippine machete sword ?

I just acquired this interesting machete sword and I think it could be WW2 Philippine ; I usually think of these type of converted machetes as being African, so if someone told me it was I wouldn't be shocked.
Attached Images
           
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2014, 10:04 PM   #2
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,408
Default

I think that it is indeed an African machete, nothing let me think that it is from the Philippines. I have seen this UK machete blades with many different fittings and so far I know this or similar blades still in production but unsure about this.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2014, 11:26 PM   #3
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

Yes, I was kind of afraid of that; the seller swore that his father brought it back from the Philippines .It's not the first time that I've been told disinformation, but it's all part of the game.
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2014, 11:33 PM   #4
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,135
Default

Yes, I also don't think this is Filipino but African.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2014, 11:43 PM   #5
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

As to the date of the blade, after doing a quick internet search, "Robert Mole and Sons," made blades 1875-1879, 1880-1881, & 1894 ; this is "Sons," not to confused with "Robert Mole," or "Robert Mole and Son."
Any ideas on how old and where from Africa it came from ? Could it be Haitian?
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2014, 03:45 AM   #6
Shakethetrees
Member
 
Shakethetrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
Default

I think it's a British issue machete blade that was remounted. The expanded tip bears strong similarities to issue machetes I've seen.

The mounts have a Philippine "feel" to me, circa 1940's, but the leatherwork with the tassels and tooling looks Mexican or Central American.
Shakethetrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2014, 10:03 AM   #7
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakethetrees
I think it's a British issue machete blade that was remounted. The expanded tip bears strong similarities to issue machetes I've seen.
.
I agree the style is similar to the old Brit army Machete, but that one is carrying civilian marks. Not the military ones.

Although "& sons" was a 19th century version company name,.

What was actually stamped on the weapons & tools didn't always match, the continually changing company names.

Mole registered the Steamer Trade Mark in 1886 and used it up to November 1920 .

Looking at the font ,Id guess the early 20th century seems likely.

These machetes were common in West Africa & the Caribbean & often "customised" in both areas...

spiral
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2014, 07:42 PM   #8
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,006
Default

I would just add to Spiral's comment that these "modified" machetes were indeed common in the West Indies, and I have several with Island names stamped into the leather sheaths (Trinidad, Tobago, Jamaica, etc.). The tassels and other decorations on the sheath of this one remind me of the West Indies examples I have seen.

Ian.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2014, 08:02 PM   #9
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

I am sure weve all realised , but no ones mentioned it yet, the scabbard is probably at least 80 years younger than the blade....

spiral
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2014, 11:21 PM   #10
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,135
Default

The scabbard could be from the Americas and the piece got reheated, which it looks. Again not Filipino though.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 12:26 AM   #11
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,258
Default

Agree with Ian; I think it's probably West Indies/S. American .
The hilt is also recognized as a Figa; a popular Brazilian charm .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 02:54 AM   #12
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

The "figa charm," motif held promise until I look it up ; a "figa fist," will have the thumb tucked under the forefinger .The fist that I have is clenching a bar,with tacks that could be interpreted in the shape of a cross.
The scabbard, although newer than the blade does have age and it is very well made; the cloth portion on the bottom is canvas; maybe this is to allow the blade to breathe or maybe it has some talismanic value.
I think the key to identification is the fist.
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 03:58 AM   #13
Robert
EAAF Staff
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
Default

I must agree that this is most likely an African piece. The clenched fist was a common symbol used there as a sign of resistance and defiance just as it was in many countries other than the Philippines. The only thing that even looks remotely Philippine to me is the general styling of the leather sheath, but with the use of the brass eyelets, the manner in which the belt loops are attached and the tooling I think that the sheath was made post WWII and most likely somewhere south of the border as a replacement.

Best,
Robert
Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 05:08 AM   #14
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

I can't disagree with anything you say except the eyelets on the scabbard could be plastic, but I think they are bone and purely for ornamentation; there is nothing but stitching holding the sheath together, no brass. The belt loop is more like a bayonet frog and it is a separate piece, cleverly going through a loop on the backside, 2 fingers back, one forward (sorry better pictures would have shown that).
I don't know where it came from or how old, but it's well made.
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 02:19 PM   #15
Shakethetrees
Member
 
Shakethetrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drac2k
The belt loop is more like a bayonet frog and it is a separate piece, cleverly going through a loop on the backside, 2 fingers back, one forward (sorry better pictures would have shown that).
I don't know where it came from or how old, but it's well made.
Now that I think of it, this "over and under" method of construction was used on pistol holsters from Mexico during the early 20th century.

I'm not sure if there is necessarily any direct link here, but I find it worth mentioning.
Shakethetrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 06:55 PM   #16
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

Very interesting ; was this strictly 19th Century Mexican or also Colonial Spanish ?
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 08:49 PM   #17
Shakethetrees
Member
 
Shakethetrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
Default

It's hard for me to say. I have not made a study of earlier objects. The holsters were just adjuncts to a few revolvers I have either seen or owned over the years.
Shakethetrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2014, 09:57 PM   #18
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drac2k
I can't disagree with anything you say except the eyelets on the scabbard could be plastic, but I think they are bone and purely for ornamentation; .
Bone wont do that job, in that manner at those dimesions, so there clearly plastic. Good close up photos would prove it though.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakethetrees
Now that I think of it, this "over and under" method of construction was used on pistol holsters from Mexico during the early 20th century..
Quote:
Originally Posted by drac2k
Very interesting ; was this strictly 19th Century Mexican or also Colonial Spanish ?
Where did 19 th century come from on this detail?

spiral
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2014, 03:37 PM   #19
ausjulius
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: musorian territory
Posts: 410
Default

its form the Caribbean.. they can come with a hand a boot a rooster or a dogs head.. ..
generally the nonspanish speaking areas prefer these styles.. in Jamaica theyll call it a cutlass
the spanish style tooled sheaths are typical but ive seen wooden ones.. atleast for tourist items..
ausjulius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2014, 04:17 PM   #20
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,258
Cool

Aha, another vote for West Indies .
I'm not alone .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2014, 04:41 PM   #21
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,734
Default

Yeah, that fist is common to West Africa. Often with the thumb poking out between the forefinger and the ring finger.
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2014, 04:04 AM   #22
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,006
Default

Because the ancestors of a substantial fraction of the West Indies' population came from Africa, and the West Indies were a British possession, does it not seem most logical to think this machete came from the West Indies? This would explain the apparent African motifs as well as why an English machete came to have this hilt.

Furthermore, we know of several examples of fist-hilted Mole machete blades of the same shape that came from the W.I. and wore similar leather sheaths. While more complicated explanations are always possible, a W.I. origin seems the simplest and most compelling to me.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.