12th November 2009, 04:44 PM | #13 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
Quote:
I agree, it really should be considered a kampilan. My edition of Cato shows it pg. 53, fig 33. It does not appear to be typical of Mindanao kampilans but as we see, there is always exceptions. The blade construction still is problematic for Mindanao being the place of origin. |
|
|
|