|
29th March 2015, 10:40 PM | #1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
Quote:
Thanks Detlef, Funny thing is that ha was once mine and I sold it like a fool, but I believe the one you have shown us is much later than the one here. |
|
29th March 2015, 10:48 PM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,571
|
Quote:
Regards, Detlef |
|
29th March 2015, 10:52 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
|
Quote:
Oh yes...apologies if I offended you...it is DEFINITELY a great comparison. The silver work looks like it could have been done by the same smith. |
|
29th March 2015, 10:56 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,571
|
Quote:
|
|
31st March 2015, 07:07 PM | #5 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,044
|
Quote:
I am grateful that you decided to part with it all those years ago. The two dha are indeed similar and the silver work is very similar to some of the Shan style but with a distinctly Chinese flavor. The scalloped chape and toe pieces in particular show a strong Chinese influence. It is quite possible that this is another Husa dha, and it is perhaps relevant that the Husa swords are found to the north, in Assam and up to the Tibet border. I particularly like the solid silver work on your new one and the ivory handle is well sculpted. Definitely a work of distinction. Ian. |
|
|
|