Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 9th June 2015, 06:21 PM   #1
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 341
Default Center of gravitiy of 17th century swords

Dear All,

I need some information about where the center of gravity of military (broad-) swords from the 17th century approximately has to be. Is there kind of a rule? Would be great if you can give me some examples.

Thanks and best regards
Andreas
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2015, 01:45 AM   #2
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

I think the location of the centre of gravity (centre of mass, point of balance) is secondary to the location of the centre of percussion (forward pivot point, centre of oscillation), which should be close to the tip. So the centre of mass should be placed to put the centre of percussion near the tip.

CoP near the tip is common for many types of cut-and-thrust swords.

I don't see many antiques with locations of the centre of mass given, but if I was to pick a typical number, I'd say 4", with 3" to 6" being the typical range. Replicas that are supposed to be good replicas often fall in this range, but often balance in a bit closer.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2015, 06:44 PM   #3
Roland_M
Member
 
Roland_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 523
Default

Hello Andreas,

Did you mean the point of balance? I am unsure.

A broad sword is normally quite forward balanced, ~15-30% of the blade length.

The balance point of a saber, rapier and small sword is much closer to the hilt, ~5-15%.

This leads to a total different fencing technique.

There are some good videos on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6r7VWIQCHvM
(Rapier vs longsword Mike & Nick AHF Sparring)

I hope, this will help.


Regards Roland
Roland_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2015, 10:51 AM   #4
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 341
Default

Thanks for your replies!
Yes, I mean the point of balance. I am not sure if "Broadsword" is the right specification. Actually I mean field swords / Felddegen. IŽve got one from the mid of the 17th century with a 77cm long blade where the balance point is at 9,2 cm (which is only around 12%), measured from the crossguard...

Best regards
Andreas
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2015, 12:29 PM   #5
Roland_M
Member
 
Roland_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 523
Default

In german language we have much more different words for edged weapons than other languages.

The closest translation for "Felddegen" is "small sword".

Your 12% are almost in the middle between 5 and 15%.



Regards Roland
Roland_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2015, 10:30 PM   #6
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

9.2cm sounds OK. What kind of hilt? How heavy is the sword.

The main thing affecting the balance will be the weight of the hilt. With heavier full baskets, the centre of balance can be as close as 7cm. With a typical mortuary sword hilt or Walloon hilt, about 10cm is common. With a lighter hilt, I'd expect to see points of balance out as far as 15cm.

I've only seen on point of balance for an original 17th century military rapier: 10cm. Not enough to judge "typical".

For 17th century sabres, I'd expect to see 15-20cm for Eastern Europe, and 8-15cm for complex-hilted sabres from Western Europe.

"Broadsword" = "not a smallsword"; i.e., a straight-bladed cut-thrust sword rather than a dedicated thrusting sword is common enough terminology, and clear enough with the context of "17th century". The only ambiguity is whether is also means "not a backsword", i.e., double-edged rather than single-edged.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2015, 10:49 PM   #7
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 341
Default

Thank you both for your answers and clarifications. I would also associate the phrase "small sword" with a slim bladed weapon designed mainly for thrust. Anyway, IŽll attach an image of the piece.
It has a quite heavy hilt but a relatively flat (6.2mm) blade. Of course this affects the center of gravity so I was wondering if this is still within the common range.
Sorry, I dont have a weighing scale to tell you the weight

Kind regards
Andreas

Last edited by AHorsa; 11th June 2015 at 11:42 PM.
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2015, 10:57 PM   #8
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 341
Default

hereŽs the picture:
Attached Images
    
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2015, 01:37 AM   #9
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

Point of balance is very much in the middle of the common range. And, looking at the sword, unsurprising.

Doesn't mean it's "well-balanced". As in my first post, I'd look for forward pivot point/centre of percussion near the tip. Ideally, within 5cm of the tip. If you're interested in checking where it is, see:
Waggle test video at http://blog.subcaelo.net/ensis/dynam...ighing-swords/
Waggle test, figure 5 in http://www.thearma.org/spotlight/GTA...nd_impacts.htm
Pendulum test, figure 6 in the same article.

That's for cut-and-thrust swords. Other swords should and will be balanced quite differently. Sabres often have PP/COP about 10-20cm from the tip, rapiers maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of a blade length from the tip. See http://www.peterjohnsson.com/the-mak...-a-long-sword/ for some examples.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.