|
24th June 2011, 06:15 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,736
|
Bollocks.
Need I say more. Sorry the picture is so bad I was on tiptoes.
|
|
|
|
24th June 2011, 06:37 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,262
|
Quote:
Where, when, how, etc. etc.. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
24th June 2011, 06:46 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,736
|
Sorry Rick, I did not note the information on this one but will update asap.
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2011, 12:40 AM
|
#4 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,738
|
"....is this a dagger I see before me, the handle toward my hand?
and on the blade, and dudgeon, gouts of blood..which was not so before." Macbeth ii, 1 The 'bollock' dagger, the forerunner of the Scottish dirk was often termed the dudgeon dagger for the hilt material which was usually fashioned out of boxwood (dudgeon) and in the 16th-17th centuries. By Victorian times, the blushing and prudish hypocrisy (P.C. even in those days forced the anatomical reference above the belt from the male metaphor to the lobed kidneys, and it began being termed the 'kidney' dagger. Nice example, and wanted to add some historical context pending the details on it. |
|
|
|
|
25th June 2011, 01:26 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
Tim, I want to visit you
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2011, 06:12 PM
|
#6 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,139
|
Yes another form of bollock dagger. Like it a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2011, 06:30 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,738
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
