|
3rd June 2017, 02:16 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 214
|
Constructionally here there are a number of positives beyond the rivets with cut washers for securing the glove leathers at the cuffs. The surviving thumb plates, while having a replaces leather, have the proper flush rivets for securing it and the end plate reposed to look like a finger nail is a feature not normally seen on Victorian copies. I believe I can see light hammer marking on the inside surfaces of the gauntlet plates which is a more period feature vs. the bend and strike from the outside with the hammer more common in modern manufacture for gauntlets. There's a good chance these are original probably c.1490-1500 Milanese style. If they are older copies they are of the highest quality. Again this is based only on photos, having the items in hand may alter perspective.
|
4th June 2017, 12:17 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 214
|
Would it be possible to get some close ups of the thumb on the opposite gauntlet as well? I think i'm picking up some slight differences in shape and dimensions, that some closer pics would help verify.
|
4th June 2017, 04:49 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 831
|
Hello Senefelder,
Thank's a lot for all precious detailled comments ! I will take and post other pictures of the thumbs area. Kind Regards ! Franco |
|
|