Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st August 2022, 08:50 PM   #1
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default A Very Interesting Philippine Weapon

Well, interesting to me anyway. I think that this Philippine dagger was picked up by a US soldier and converted into a "D Guard," knife. Thank God that it was dated or it would probably have been listed as an American Civil War Confederate Dagger. It is also named F.A. NENSTIEHL which I am guessing isn't a Philippine name. The knife measures 17" long.
Any comments would be welcomed.
Attached Images
      
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2022, 04:46 AM   #2
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,005
Default

This appears to be a wavy-bladed dagger made in Luzon. The date implies it came from the early period of U.S. occupation following the Spanish-American War. There are quite a few D-guard weapons from that period, some attributable to former Spanish units and some to revolutionary Filipino units. Some were also made as souvenirs for the victors. The terminal "dagger" point is a feature seen on some of the wavy-bladed weapons from the late stages of Spanish rule in the Philippines. I have a sword from that period showing the same feature. It was subsequently carried forward on wavy-bladed weapons made in central and northern Luzon until the mid-20th C and possibly later.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2022, 12:28 PM   #3
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

What you state makes complete sense; maybe it was a battlefield pick up and the soldier dated it and named it. One of the American Campaigns in the Philippines was against Mindanao from July 4, 1902, through Dec. 31, 1904, which kind of falls within the date on the handle; so even if the dagger was from Luzon, it would not be uncommon for soldiers to trade "war souvenirs."
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2022, 11:26 PM   #4
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,135
Default

The scabbard though looks more Visayan to me. Ian what are your thoughts?
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2022, 12:29 AM   #5
RobT
Member
 
RobT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 445
Default Rehilted?

Hi All,

Ian makes a good point (no pun intended). The point of my serpentine bladed short sword is a dead ringer for the one on drac2k's blade. I wonder if the strange metal piece in front of the D-guard isn't a remnant of the type of cross guard on my sword. Perhaps the dagger got a new sheath, hilt, and guard in the Visayas.

Sincerely,
RobT
Attached Images
 
RobT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2022, 02:58 AM   #6
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

The metal piece in front of the "D guard," is actually part of the blade; the same configuration as yours at the base of your blade above the hilt only shorter.

Last edited by drac2k; 3rd August 2022 at 03:02 AM. Reason: to add information
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2022, 01:12 PM   #7
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battara View Post
The scabbard though looks more Visayan to me. Ian what are your thoughts?
I agree Battara. That leather wrap at the throat does have a Visayan flavor and the brass bands would also be consistent. Maybe a later pairing of blade and scabbard
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2022, 01:18 PM   #8
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,005
Default

Hi Rob,

Your example is another central/northern Luzon piece, possibly Kapangan or Ilokano in manufacture. I think yours is somewhat later in manufacture, probably post WWII. These were common bring backs by U.S. military stationed in the Philippines after WWII.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2022, 03:10 PM   #9
Victrix
Member
 
Victrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 672
Default

I think the presence of a handguard marks this out as a military weapon.
Victrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2022, 06:30 PM   #10
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,173
Default

In regards to a handguard disqualifying it as a military weapon, I respectfully disagree. We have our famous American Civil War "D Guard Bowies," The L.F.&C & the ACCO 1917 Trench Knives, as well as a host of WW1 & WW2 Theater Made knives w/"D Guards, " not to mention Jason McCord's cut-down Cavalry sword that he often employed in the Western Frontier.
Paramilitary units often had non-standardized weapons such as this one; whether the application was practical or not was of secondary importance; just so long as they were scary.
Usually, with your typical souvenir pieces, you not only have a date and a name but a place, which this one doesn't, which tells me that this one wasn't generically made.
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.