Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st August 2014, 01:00 PM   #1
RSWORD
Member
 
RSWORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,083
Default Unusual figural hilt

I shared this example on the figural hilt thread. Unusual handle with spiral body and head. Blade has seen its better days. Scabbard seems to be in the Balinese style but the blade is too short for the scabbard so I presume this to be a mismatch. Would be interested in any thoughts or comments about this piece.
Attached Images
      
RSWORD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2014, 01:02 AM   #2
RSWORD
Member
 
RSWORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,083
Default

David,

When I posted this one on the figural thread I had tagged it Balinese but you didn't think so. Don't know if the additional pictures sway you in any direction but what do you think?
RSWORD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2014, 01:31 AM   #3
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,676
Default

Personally I doubt that it is a keris hilt.

A ferrule like this is very, very non-typical for a keris hilt. But it could be a keris hilt, a person who was outside the mainstream may have carved and fitted it.

It looks more like nondescript knife/dagger/tool handle than a keris hilt.

If I could handle it I could form a better opinion, from a photo these things are always difficult.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2014, 02:42 AM   #4
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,259
Default

Agree, I think it is a repurposed handle; something about the carving of the face says more Java than Bali to me .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2014, 09:50 AM   #5
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

I agree with Alan and Rick. Any opinion about the blade origin, javanese or older balinese?
Regards

Last edited by Jean; 9th August 2014 at 09:14 AM.
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2020, 09:48 PM   #6
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
Personally I doubt that it is a keris hilt.

A ferrule like this is very, very non-typical for a keris hilt. But it could be a keris hilt, a person who was outside the mainstream may have carved and fitted it.

It looks more like nondescript knife/dagger/tool handle than a keris hilt.

If I could handle it I could form a better opinion, from a photo these things are always difficult.
I'd bet it was originally made as a handle for a betel nut chisel.
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2020, 09:51 PM   #7
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,676
Default

Yeah Rick, it could be I suppose, but to me it seems too big for that. All the handles of those little pestles that I've seen are much smaller, and tend to be sort like a pistol grip style. I think the name for those things is "pelecok" but I'm not sure and I have been unable to confirm.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2014, 01:03 PM   #8
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RSWORD
David,

When I posted this one on the figural thread I had tagged it Balinese but you didn't think so. Don't know if the additional pictures sway you in any direction but what do you think?
Well, the sheath is certainly Bali. Not sure on the blade, especially given it's current condition. Of course, even it the blade AND sheath are Bali that would not preclude a hilt being placed on this keris from a different origin. Happens all the time. I am somewhat of the same mind as Alan though that this is possibly not originally meant to be a keris hilt at all. It also seems that it is missing a ferrule ring which may or may not have provided a clue to its origin.

Last edited by David; 9th August 2014 at 04:53 AM.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2014, 01:17 PM   #9
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,676
Default

Yes, the ferrule itself is missing, but it has been cut so deep that I cannot envisage anything that belongs to a keris being with it.

The blade looks like it might be Balinese, again I'd have to handle it to be relatively certain, especially in the condition that its in.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2014, 07:02 PM   #10
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

Thank you Alan and David.
I attach the pic of one old (kris?) hilt specimen with a deeply carved base and fitted with a ferrule for whatever reason (damage?). The Solo nunggak semi hilts fitted with a selut also have a recessed base (but less deeply cut) for inserting the selut.
Best regards
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Jean; 9th August 2014 at 09:18 AM.
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2014, 12:55 AM   #11
RSWORD
Member
 
RSWORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,083
Default

Thanks everyone for the feedback. I appreciate it.
RSWORD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2020, 02:09 PM   #12
GIO
Member
 
GIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean
Thank you Alan and David.
I attach the pic of one old (kris?) hilt specimen with a deeply carved base and fitted with a ferrule for whatever reason (damage?). The Solo nunggak semi hilts fitted with a selut also have a recessed base (but less deeply cut) for inserting the selut.
Best regards
IMHO such deeply carved base has the purpose of fitting a keris hilt to a pestel for betel nut breaking.
GIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.