Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29th August 2018, 05:32 AM   #1
Green
Member
 
Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 307
Default Question on this keris... how many luks etc

Here is a javanese (?) blade dressed in Malay(?) Sulawesi (?) dress.
The pamor has been severely eroded and I have a few questions that I hope I get some comments/answers

1) I count 8 luks but not sure if this is correct as normally keris has odd number luks.

Is the count correct? if so, is it possible that this keris has been shortened? or is it an original even number luks?

I can not see obvious shortening signs but I could be wrong. It is feasible that it is shortened because the blade look very worn out and tip may have been damaged.

2) The base of the blade has some decorations. This is usually plated with gold colored material but here it is absent except for two little kinatahs . have these been worn out or it has never been there? I think it is the latter.

So, are the kinatahs latter addition?

3) what form of blade is this?
Attached Images
         
Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2018, 07:20 AM   #2
Henk
Member
 
Henk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
Default

I count 9 luk.
Beautiful keris. Congrats on this one. Kinatah has been worn out. Thats why you have 2 pieces left.
Henk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2018, 08:10 AM   #3
drdavid
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 369
Default

Hi Green
I agree with Henk, I think your kinatah has worn away and I would count 9 luk. If you use the search you can find some comments on counting luk from Alan Maisey, in short by definition there are always an odd number of luks, and if you count an even number add one
cheers
DrDavid
drdavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2018, 08:56 AM   #4
Bejo
Member
 
Bejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: East Java, Indonesia
Posts: 42
Default

Hi Green,

A very nice keris.
I also count 9 luk. But the last luk only show little. Is it because the tip got corroded?
Is it Majapahit keris or maybe in the same era?

Regards,

Joe
Bejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2018, 01:02 PM   #5
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,675
Default

This keris cannot be classified as Mojopahit.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2018, 03:26 PM   #6
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
This keris cannot be classified as Mojopahit.
I would agree with you Alan, though i am certain i form my opinion from a far less informed position. Could you possibly elaborate a little on your opinion here? I think it would be beneficial to all to gain a better understanding of key elements that can lead to such an opinion. Do you find that this keris is classifiable based solely on the photos presented here?
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2018, 10:55 PM   #7
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,675
Default

David, Bejo asked this question:-

"Is it Majapahit keris or maybe in the same era?"

This indicates to me that Bejo is thinking in the way that most keris conscious people think about keris tangguh classifications, he is equating the classification of Majapahit with the era of Majapahit, that is , pre-1525. Thus, my response to Bejo's question was related to the idea of this keris originating in the region of East Jawa that was under the control of the Majapahit court pre-1525.

However, if we take a more relaxed approach and pretend that we are a keris dealer in a market somewhere in Jawa, then perhaps we might be able to convince somebody who has insufficient experience to believe that this keris can be classified as Mojo. It does look a little bit like what a lot of people would call Mojo. But it is neither pre-1525, nor classifiable as Mojo.

There are a number of reasons for me to take this position, and to mention all of them and try to explain all of them would use more time than I am prepared to put into this answer. So I will be brief:- material, pamor distribution, blumbangan all do not support a Mojo classification. The classification cannot be supported in either the classical belief system sense, or the logical historical sense, but it might be able to be supported in the commercial pasar sense.

I am prepared to give an opinion on what it is not, my opinion on what it might be can be read as hedged with the usual qualifications. Probably East Jawa, pre-1900, post 1700.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2018, 01:15 PM   #8
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

Thank you Alan and I fully share your evaluation.
Regards
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2018, 11:07 AM   #9
Bejo
Member
 
Bejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: East Java, Indonesia
Posts: 42
Default

Thank you for your explanation.

Best regards,

Joe
Bejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.