Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 8th October 2017, 05:09 PM   #1
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
Default Perhaps the World's Ugliest Nimcha, but Still Quite Interesting

This nimcha will win few awards for aesthetics, but it may illustrate for us how the nimcha became such a prestige weapon that it was copied by some tribal societies further to the south of it Moroccan origins.

The sword has a hammered blade that is quite crude, with forging flaws aplenty. Note the central fuller has been "hammered in" rather than "chiseled out." The hilt is wood with, form fitted for the hand, and inlaid with brass wire typical to other hilts of the Maghreb. The guard may have been bought or traded for, as it is clearly the finest piece of ironwork on the weapon. The handguard is crude but elegant in its own right.

The sword was fitted with a Manding style scabbard once complete with all the tassels and trappings, but those have all been carefully removed, with only the attaching buttons remaining. My own humble theory is that a Manding style baldric would have been too short and made the long sword too difficult to retrieve from an underarm position. Most Moroccan nimchas have their baldrics mounted to opposite sides of the scabbard mouth's locket, for much easier retrieval of a long sword. This is why I believe the manding style baldric was removed in favor of perhaps fitting the sword through a belt.

Observations and comments are welcomed!

Dimensions:

Overall length: 39in.
Blade length: 33.33in.
Widest point of the blade: 1.5in.
Attached Images
       

Last edited by CharlesS; 8th October 2017 at 09:03 PM.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2017, 06:16 PM   #2
motan
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jerusalem
Posts: 274
Default

Not my area, but I am not sure it should be called nimcha. Looks like a Tuareg of other Saharan straight sword with some nimcha and other Moroccan features. A Berber mix. Does not mean it is not authentic, just not a nimcha.
By the way, I son't think it is that ugly
motan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2017, 07:01 PM   #3
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

Well, Charles, you ARE high maintenance!

Is Kate Upton just “OK” on your scale?

Motan, I am with you: this is a charming “dog’s breakfast”. I like it. I would still call it a nimcha: if Karud is good enough , this should pass the test:-)
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2017, 08:37 PM   #4
Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Member
 
Ibrahiim al Balooshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesS
This nimcha will win few awards for aesthetics, but it may illustrate for us how the nimcha became such a prestige weapon that it was copied by some tribal societies further to the south of it Moroccan origins.

The sword has a hammered blade that is quite crude, with forging flaws aplenty. Note the central fuller has been "hammered in" rather than "chiseled out." The hilt is wood with, form fitted for the hand, and inlaid with brass wire typical to other hilts of the Maghreb. The guard may have been bought or traded for, as it is clearly the finest piece of ironwork on the weapon. The handguard is crude but elegant in its own right.

The sword was fitted with a Manding style scabbard once complete with all the tassels and trappings, but those have all been carefully removed, with only the attaching buttons remaining. My own humble theory is that a Manding style baldric would have been too short and made the long sword to difficult to retrieve from an underarm position. Most Moroccan nimchas have their baldrics mounted to opposite sides of the scabbard mouth's locket, for much easier retrieval of a long sword. This is why I believe the manding style baldric was removed in favor of perhaps fitting the sword through a belt.

Observations and comments are welcomed!

Dimensions:

Overall length: 39in.
Blade length: 33.33in.
Widest point of the blade: 1.5in.

Its a Nimcha but with all the ingredients you mention. A great old brute !!
Ibrahiim al Balooshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2017, 09:14 PM   #5
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
Default

Thanks for the input guys!

Ariel, I meant "ugliest" in the "kindest, gentlest, most nurturing way".
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2017, 06:38 AM   #6
mariusgmioc
Member
 
mariusgmioc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,860
Default

Maybe border-line but still a Nimcha.

I find this sword exceptional because it is a genuine representation of a local tradition. Moreover, as opposed to the majority of the classic Nimchas that are fitted with European blades, this one has an obviously hand forged locally made blade, making the sword even more valuable.

Thank you for sharig!
mariusgmioc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2017, 05:26 PM   #7
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

You know what?
I think it's a karud.
More seriously, it's a nice and ugly sword.
The nimcha are not nimcha, so i don't think it's a problem to call it nimcha...
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2017, 03:36 AM   #8
shayde78
Member
 
shayde78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 442
Default

She is gorgeous!
Being able to see each blow of the hammer that coaxed a blade out of metal is like seeing the brush strokes of a painter on an old canvas. Sure, a photograph is a cleaner representation of the subject matter, but you can sense an artist's personality in less refined works. I'm reminded of a trip to the Van Gogh museum-totally different from seeing the same works printed in a book.
Thanks for posting this eye candy.
shayde78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2017, 11:03 AM   #9
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,066
Default

I agree with the others in the aesthetics of this piece. Shall we call it 'tribal folk art?" Like it either way!
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2017, 02:10 PM   #10
Pieje
Member
 
Pieje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 132
Default

Nothing ugly on this one!!
Pieje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2017, 04:01 PM   #11
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
Default

Thank you all for your kind words and observations. I meant "ugly" in the most humble way....were it truly "ugly" I doubt I would make room for it. I just find it a very interesting tribal interpretation of a nimcha. Its crude characteristics are what make it alluring.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.