Qajar from the period?

archer · 21st December 2008, 02:55 AM

Hi, Is this an actual Zirah Bouk of the period or an early item for the British & European tourist trade? I asked and found that the blade at the hilt was under an 1/8 in. It hardly seems functional. Were these daggers made for dress and or tourists? The workmanship at times seems to make them a potential collectors sub category. Your thoughts?? Regards and Merry Christmas, Steve

ALEX · 21st December 2008, 12:29 PM

I do not think it is Qajar, Steve. It looks 19 Cent Indian.
The form mimics a real "adult" version, and if it is so much smaller in proportions - it could have been made for a child.

katana · 21st December 2008, 05:20 PM

Certainly looks Indian. The tip seems very thick (looks to be 3/8" -1/2").....strange that the blade is so much thinner at the hilt end at only 1/8" Perhaps the hardness of the steel allows this.... is the blade very flexible ?

Regards David

archer · 21st December 2008, 06:02 PM

Overall it is fifteen inches, with a 10 inch blade and a 5inch hilt. Were most of these 19th century Indian blades meant to be functional, or dress / touristy items for sale? I let it go do to the thickness on a mail piercing blade.
My mistake on the period, I thought it extended into the 1900s. Thank you all for your responses.
Steve

21st December 2008, 02:55 AM	#1
archer Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 373	Qajar from the period? Hi, Is this an actual Zirah Bouk of the period or an early item for the British & European tourist trade? I asked and found that the blade at the hilt was under an 1/8 in. It hardly seems functional. Were these daggers made for dress and or tourists? The workmanship at times seems to make them a potential collectors sub category. Your thoughts?? Regards and Merry Christmas, Steve Attached Images Last edited by archer; 21st December 2008 at 03:06 AM.

21st December 2008, 06:02 PM	#4
archer Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 373	Dimensions Overall it is fifteen inches, with a 10 inch blade and a 5inch hilt. Were most of these 19th century Indian blades meant to be functional, or dress / touristy items for sale? I let it go do to the thickness on a mail piercing blade. My mistake on the period, I thought it extended into the 1900s. Thank you all for your responses. Steve

21st December 2008, 12:29 PM	#2
ALEX Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 936	I do not think it is Qajar, Steve. It looks 19 Cent Indian. The form mimics a real "adult" version, and if it is so much smaller in proportions - it could have been made for a child.

21st December 2008, 05:20 PM	#3
katana Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Kent Posts: 2,653	Certainly looks Indian. The tip seems very thick (looks to be 3/8" -1/2").....strange that the blade is so much thinner at the hilt end at only 1/8" Perhaps the hardness of the steel allows this.... is the blade very flexible ? Regards David