Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18th October 2015, 10:33 PM   #1
endeavour192
Member
 
endeavour192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Default Tibetan helmet

Hello,
I baught this helmet when i was in Lhasa (Tibet) in 1987.



I just wanted to know if it is an antique tibetan helmet (18e or 19e century), or if it is a fake ?
Best regards
Attached Images
 
endeavour192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2015, 11:44 PM   #2
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

Short answer endeavour192, it is a modern helmet, despite what some very reputable arms and armour auction houses and some of the big three international names write about the type.

Gavin
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2015, 11:48 PM   #3
Oliver Pinchot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 456
Default

Agree with Gavin, it is a modern copy.
Oliver Pinchot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2015, 12:29 AM   #4
endeavour192
Member
 
endeavour192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Default

Thank you both for your quick answer !

And what about this buthanese sword ?
Attached Images
  
endeavour192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2015, 01:02 AM   #5
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

The sword looks much better but without full disclosure of the blade I could not confirm as the art of sword making is still carried through to today...it does however show nice age patina.

Regards

Gavin
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2015, 03:45 AM   #6
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by endeavour192
I just wanted to know if it is an antique tibetan helmet (18e or 19e century), or if it is a fake ?
In addition to the opinion above, I'll add that the lamellar neck-guard is laced incorrectly. Not just a little wrong, but completely wrong.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2015, 09:01 AM   #7
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,145
Default

bhutan swords are still part of the national dress, the king wears his frequently on state occasions. makes it harder to date them as they are actively being traditionally made as i type.

the king:
Attached Images
 
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2015, 10:13 AM   #8
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,145
Default

also, the swords come in various lengths and grades. my 'villager' model:
Attached Images
  
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2015, 12:09 PM   #9
David R
Member
 
David R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,048
Default

I had one of those, many years ago. I greatly regret letting it go, a very well made blade, very simply mounted.
David R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2015, 01:27 AM   #10
dennee
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 186
Default

That's a baanmok, a Lepcha knife from Sikkim. There are similarities to the working knives of Bhutan.

I have often wondered if the baanmok blades of the fullered type were made by Nepalese smiths.
dennee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2015, 10:06 AM   #11
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,145
Default

you are correct,

found this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by denee
The knife or short sword is the traditional "ban" of the Lepcha people, who principally came to live in remoter, forested valleys in Sikkim, but were found in Bhutan as well and across the Nepal border. Although it frequently appears as "Bhutanese," it is distinct (in length, blade shape and composition, scabbard and decoration) from the typical arms of the ethnically Tibetan Bhutias who migrated into the area and became the majority (at least before the influx of a great number of Nepalis to the area). I believe that Lord Egerton identifies such a piece as from Bhutan, as indeed it could have been made, used and collected there. A photographed example in his book is identified as from "Bhotan or Nepalese Frontier.".
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2015, 04:42 PM   #12
endeavour192
Member
 
endeavour192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Default Himalayan helmets

Thank you. What about thoses helmets ? Is it real old (18-19e century) ?
It is isupposed to be tibetan and bhutanese helmet.





Endeavour192, The posting of items currently at auction is strictly against forum rules.

Robert

Last edited by Robert; 26th October 2015 at 04:33 PM.
endeavour192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2015, 11:04 AM   #13
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

All the genuine ones I've seen are a bowl, with lamellar or textile defences hanging from it. The ones like this, with solid back and sides extended well below the front (or you could say that the front is cut-out for the eyes) have been fake. So I'd assume the left-hand (Tibetan) one to be fake.

The Bhutanese helmet looks genuine, as far as I can tell from the photo. Plausibly 19th century. The bowl could be older, with newer cloth.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2015, 03:13 PM   #14
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by endeavour192
Thank you. What about thoses helmets ? Is it real old (18-19e century) ?
It is isupposed to be tibetan and bhutanese helmet.
With both being auctioned I would not comment on either.

Gavin
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2015, 12:15 AM   #15
endeavour192
Member
 
endeavour192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Default

OK i understand !
endeavour192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2015, 02:28 PM   #16
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

endeavour192,

If you want to view better Tibetan and Bhutan Helms, armour and arms, get yourself "Warriors of the Himalayas, rediscovering the arms and armor of Tibet" by Donald J LaRocca and "Bhutan, Mountain Fortress of the Gods", in particular the chapter within, "The Way to the Throne" by Francoise Pommaret.

Attached is one of mine that you may have seen?

Gavin
Attached Images
 
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2015, 12:26 AM   #17
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,135
Default

Since one of these items are from a current auction, this thread is closed.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2015, 12:33 AM   #18
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,135
Default

Issues resolved. We can now continue.

If i understand right, true antique Tibetan helmets are insanely rare!
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2015, 02:49 AM   #19
estcrh
Member
 
estcrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battara
Issues resolved. We can now continue.

If i understand right, true antique Tibetan helmets are insanely rare!
Here is a comparison between the helmet being discussed here and what appears to be an authentic one of the same type.
Attached Images
 
estcrh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2015, 12:20 AM   #20
endeavour192
Member
 
endeavour192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Default

Yes thank you, i know "Warriors of the Himalayas, rediscovering the arms and armor of Tibet" by Donald J LaRocca and i met Françoise Pommaret this year during a trip in Bhutan.
Not easy to find real antiques helmets !
endeavour192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2015, 05:08 AM   #21
Bob A
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 404
Default

While I live in complete ignorance of Tibetan helmets, I'd have to say that to my uneducated eye, there are anomalies that lead me to doubt that the helmet in question is of significant age.

The improper lacing of the plates is apparent, but could be excused as an inept reassembly after having dismantled the helmet for "restoration".

The designs on the bowl of the helmet appear rather fresh, and the riveting seems modern. It seems to lack any sort of patina stemming from use.

All that said, while it may not be new, it seems to be satisfactorily Tibetan, given the source. "Fake" is a term I'd only use if an object was deliberately misidentified for larcenous purpose; the artifact is what it is, and does not seem to lie, or to bear deliberate false witness about itself. That said, I have no knowledge about how it may have been represented at an auction site.
Bob A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2015, 08:36 AM   #22
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

One might be tempted to attribute the mis-lacing to bad restoration, but it's the standard lacing on this type of helmet. It's how they make them in the first place.

Most of these helmets are sold as antiques. They appear to be made with that intent. I'm happy to call them fakes.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2015, 04:34 PM   #23
Bob A
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timo Nieminen
One might be tempted to attribute the mis-lacing to bad restoration, but it's the standard lacing on this type of helmet. It's how they make them in the first place.

Most of these helmets are sold as antiques. They appear to be made with that intent. I'm happy to call them fakes.
My guess regarding the lacing was that the plate overlapping was done opposite the way I would expect - and the way that it exists on the other helmet illustrated. Rather disturbing that the maker should have been so clueless.

I bow to your experience and expertise regarding seller's intent. Caveat emptor, as ever.
Bob A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2015, 10:01 PM   #24
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

Having seen many of these offered for sale over the years, I've wondered the same thing. Doesn't seem like it would be too hard to lace them correctly. But every single one I've seen has been laced this way (the wrong way). I don't know whether they all come out of the same workshop, of whether they're copies of each other by different makers.

(I haven't been counting, but it's surely more than a dozen I've seen.)
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2015, 11:19 PM   #25
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,145
Default

tibetan cavalry -note lamellae are laced and overlapped to guard from strikes from below. as is the properly laced helmet posted earlier. infantry lamellar armour would be laced the other way, more like roof tiles, to protect from blows from above. lamella are overlapped to increase the metal and to support the lamella next to them - distributing the force from a blow, not side by side which only presents one thickness & has weak points (gaps) at the butted edges.
Attached Images
 
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2015, 05:24 AM   #26
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

However, in practice, lamellar worn by infantry is still laced the same way, with the same kind of overlap (lower lamellae on the outside of the upper lamellae). Scale armour, whether worn by cavalry or infantry, overlaps the other way. Which suggests that the direction of overlap isn't a big factor in the protection.

That there is overlap matters. An arrow coming in will have to get through, typically, 2 to 4 layers of iron/steel to get through the armour.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2015, 05:45 AM   #27
estcrh
Member
 
estcrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
Default

Here is the type of helmet worn by Tibetan warriors in the later periods, the type originally posted here for discussion would be from a much older period and would show its age.
Attached Images
  
estcrh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.