Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10th September 2008, 04:12 PM   #1
Ed
Member
 
Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 189
Default Blast from the past: An Oakeschott Sword

There are a couple of threads about some of my objects that are pretty old (ca. 2000) yet have, I think some interest still.





This was my original post
Quote:
I recently purchased a sword at auction that belonged to Oakeshott. Rather than post pictures I direct you to the following reference: The Archaeology of Weapons, plate 20 b. This sword has been referenced many times in Oakeshotts works, generally dated to ca. 1450. (also Sword in the Age of Chivilry plate 43 b, and so on, I can provide other references for anyone interested).

Now, my question is this: I have had my dear friends at the Met in NY examine this sword and their position is that it is highly composite. The blade might be 1450 or so, but the assemblage' is later.

By their admission they LOOK for fakes and would rather let 10 good ones go by if they can kick out one bad one.

What do you folks think? Inquiring minds want to know.
I will re-post comments from Jim, Lee and Scott Bubar unless there are objections.

Ah, yes ... the original thread is here

http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000018.html
Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 05:40 PM   #2
celtan
Member
 
celtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
Default

So what if it's a composite..? When blades were kept in the family, they often underwent repair and upgrades. The part of the sword that most suffers is the hilt, being in contact with salty sweat. They don't last forever.

The fact that it has been repaired or serviced leads more credence to the genuineness of a weapon, compared to one that shows very little wear.

Regards

M
celtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2008, 06:48 AM   #3
FenrisWolf
Member
 
FenrisWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by celtan
So what if it's a composite..? When blades were kept in the family, they often underwent repair and upgrades. The part of the sword that most suffers is the hilt, being in contact with salty sweat. They don't last forever.

The fact that it has been repaired or serviced leads more credence to the genuineness of a weapon, compared to one that shows very little wear.

Regards

M
Heck, I have an old 'hunting sword' that is the result of a chopped off broadsword blade whose profile could date to the 1300s, riveted to a piece of staghorn, with a decorated brass disk for a guard whose ornamentation looks vaguely Victorian. Great conversation piece even if its provenance is all over the place...
FenrisWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.