Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18th May 2018, 05:45 PM   #1
Bob A
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 415
Default

Jimpul?
Bob A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2018, 06:27 PM   #2
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob A
Jimpul?
Thanks for the input, Bob, but I believe a jimpul has a greater curve, and technically, doesn't have a stabbing "point/tip", only a cutting/hacking edge.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2018, 09:38 PM   #3
Amuk Murugul
Member
 
Amuk Murugul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kaboejoetan Galoenggoeng Mélben
Posts: 457
Default

Hullo Charles,

Nice piece!
I believe I may know the previous owner in Sarawak. Your piece looks identical to his, except his was missing the 3rd rotan binding (nearest the throat) and the middle binding was new. Also, his was uncleaned. He called his piece JIMPUL, early 20thC.
So, it looks like it may be down to a name-game.
Bottom line: It depends on faith, whether you follow the mainstream or a different school.
To me, it would be a JUMPUL; but then, I have other 'similar name' blade types: viz. JAMBUL, JEMPUL, and JIMPUL.

Best,
Amuk Murugul is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.