Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23rd July 2008, 02:03 PM   #1
stephen wood
Member
 
stephen wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default how curved can a tulwar be? (before it becomes a shamshir)

Hello,

on finding this tulwar I was quite impressed by the amount of curve at the beginning of the false edge - does anyone recognize the particular type?

Many thanks.
Attached Images
    

Last edited by stephen wood; 23rd July 2008 at 03:10 PM. Reason: spelling
stephen wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2008, 02:47 PM   #2
RhysMichael
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 520
Default

I've seen other Tulwar with highly curved blades. I have seen some of them described as shamshir when the blade cuved this much even though they had tulwar hilts. I don't know which is the proper naming. Someone here will. This looks like a great blade the tip flares some a little like a kilij. My impression from the picture is that you have a good find. As I said though others will better be able to tell you
RhysMichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2008, 07:27 PM   #3
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,746
Default

Hi Stephen,
This is a beautiful example of a tulwar, all the more so for its simplicity which suggests it is primarily a fighting weapon without the ceremonial affectations. The uniform light pitting nicely reflects its age into likely 18th century, as well as the style which suggests to me it is probably from Rajasthan or regions into Punjab.

The blade with yelman also has a pronounced ricasso at the terminus of the blade edge near the hilt. It seems there has been considerable debate on this, but there is a vaguely described tulwar form attributed primarily to Sikhs termed 'halab'. In the description it, as noted, includes reference to finger guard, and it seems possible this raised ricasso might meet that definition.
The extreme upturn and yelman on this blade is unusual, but by no means unique and it seems that Indian blades with yelman are mostly of 18th century into the opening of the 19th.

It seems there are likely more specific references not at hand at the moment, but I would say at first glance, this tulwar is quite likely either Sikh or Rajput and of the regions and period noted.

The Persian term shamshir refers to those curved blades which radius to a point without yelman. The Mughal courts were of course highly characterized by Persian influence, which added confusion to terminology with tulwar a generally applied term used in India for sword, and the Persian term applied to swords with the angled pommel hilt. I have seen sabres with Persian style hilt and Indian flueret langets and tulwar quillon terminals with knuckleguard called 'Persian style hilt tulwar'. I have usually considered these from Sind, but research remains incomplete.

As always, more research will likely reveal more!

A very nice warrior!

All the best,
Jim

Last edited by Jim McDougall; 23rd July 2008 at 11:42 PM.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2008, 10:13 PM   #4
ward
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
Default

This is not particulary unusuall. Yes it is persian influenced.
ward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2008, 11:03 PM   #5
chevalier
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
Default

now that i have mine, pictures should be forthcomming
chevalier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 04:32 PM   #6
stephen wood
Member
 
stephen wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default

...many thanks for your help.

when it arrives I will post more images and dimensions. Presumably the index finger was looped over the quillon?
stephen wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 04:34 PM   #7
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,262
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen wood
[FONT=Book Antiqua
Presumably the index finger was looped over the quillon?[/FONT]
That has been the source of some discussion on this site .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 06:40 PM   #8
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick
That has been the source of some discussion on this site .
Oh Oh!!!
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 06:56 PM   #9
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,262
Talking

I think we came to the conclusion that the Indian style of swordsmanship dictated no fingering of the quillon .

I am a forgetful old man so all bets are off on this being correct .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 07:10 PM   #10
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick
I think we came to the conclusion that the Indian style of swordsmanship dictated no fingering of the quillon .

I am a forgetful old man so all bets are off on this being correct .
You mean correct on the quillon issue or on being an old man?
The age part frightens me ... i'm only half year "younger"
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 07:11 PM   #11
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
Oh Oh!!!
Oh Oh plus
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 07:48 PM   #12
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,262
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
You mean correct on the quillon issue or on being an old man?
The age part frightens me ... i'm only half year "younger"
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 10:33 PM   #13
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

Rick, you are correct. On both counts.
Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.