GERMAN SIDEARM?? for I.D Please

kahnjar1 · 7th November 2008, 07:50 PM

A friend of mine has this item acquired recently. Can someone please I.D. Not shown in pics, but there is a Crown over 0 over 8 on the spine of the blade.
Thanks in advance.
Regards Stuart

Atlantia · 7th November 2008, 08:46 PM

It appears to be a variation of the 1869 Werder Yataghan bayonet with the end cut down.
At least the blade seems to be that.
If the handle is original its some variation I'm unfamiliar with, presumably for Artillery (or possibly a bandsman?)

Edit: There were plenty of variations within these bayonets/swords, I wonder if this was made as-is even with the short nose? Does it look recently cut back? The curve shows the blank was intended to be the standard Yataghan, but it would be an effective stabber at this length, but Its a strange blade to see in a handle which you expect a double edged 'gladius' style blade, but there were other types. The pioneer reg's had some single edged with saw backs.
Its an interesting piece.

Atlantia · 10th November 2008, 04:58 PM

Hi Stuart,
Suprised nobody else has chimed in to solve this little mystery!
From reviewing the pictures it looks like the blade has been in the handle for a very long time so I'd assume its original to it. I notice that it has a single tang pin, whereas the bayonet version would have had 2 plus the tang was full handle length incorporating the spring catch etc. The tang in your sword must be shorter by the look of it, whether or not it extends far beyond the pin. The pin is in the right place (as in the same as the bayonet). I've had quite a few Yataghan bayonets over the years and I specifically remember having one with the same solingen makers marks. I don't recognise the Gladius style handle though. I'm thinking it may well be a deliberate marriage shortened bayonet blade and gladius handle for a specific reason. The bandsmens swords often have lighter handles, and yours is the same scale as artillery or pioneer style swords which would make the short blade very back heavy I imagine. Have you had a chance to have another close look and see if you notice anything more?

Regards
Gene

William V. · 10th November 2008, 07:03 PM

The marking could be:

Weyersberg & Stamm
Solingen

All the best

William

Iliad · 12th November 2008, 09:39 PM

Hi everyone. I am the owner of the item, which my good friend Stu has kindly posted for me. There are no markings other than those already mentioned.
I shall attempt to attach 2 pics of the piece side by side with a Snider sword bayonet, for comparative purposes. Thank you for your assistance. Brian

Atlantia · 15th November 2008, 12:40 PM

http://www.old-smithy.info/bayonets/...n%20models.htm

About half way down the page. Still can't place tha hilt on yours.

7th November 2008, 07:50 PM	#1
kahnjar1 Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND Posts: 2,730	GERMAN SIDEARM?? for I.D Please A friend of mine has this item acquired recently. Can someone please I.D. Not shown in pics, but there is a Crown over 0 over 8 on the spine of the blade. Thanks in advance. Regards Stuart Attached Images

7th November 2008, 08:46 PM	#2
Atlantia Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: The Sharp end Posts: 2,928	It appears to be a variation of the 1869 Werder Yataghan bayonet with the end cut down. At least the blade seems to be that. If the handle is original its some variation I'm unfamiliar with, presumably for Artillery (or possibly a bandsman?) Edit: There were plenty of variations within these bayonets/swords, I wonder if this was made as-is even with the short nose? Does it look recently cut back? The curve shows the blank was intended to be the standard Yataghan, but it would be an effective stabber at this length, but Its a strange blade to see in a handle which you expect a double edged 'gladius' style blade, but there were other types. The pioneer reg's had some single edged with saw backs. Its an interesting piece. Last edited by Atlantia; 8th November 2008 at 01:09 AM.

10th November 2008, 04:58 PM	#3
Atlantia Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: The Sharp end Posts: 2,928	Hi Stuart, Suprised nobody else has chimed in to solve this little mystery! From reviewing the pictures it looks like the blade has been in the handle for a very long time so I'd assume its original to it. I notice that it has a single tang pin, whereas the bayonet version would have had 2 plus the tang was full handle length incorporating the spring catch etc. The tang in your sword must be shorter by the look of it, whether or not it extends far beyond the pin. The pin is in the right place (as in the same as the bayonet). I've had quite a few Yataghan bayonets over the years and I specifically remember having one with the same solingen makers marks. I don't recognise the Gladius style handle though. I'm thinking it may well be a deliberate marriage shortened bayonet blade and gladius handle for a specific reason. The bandsmens swords often have lighter handles, and yours is the same scale as artillery or pioneer style swords which would make the short blade very back heavy I imagine. Have you had a chance to have another close look and see if you notice anything more? Regards Gene Last edited by Atlantia; 10th November 2008 at 05:16 PM.

12th November 2008, 09:39 PM	#5
Iliad Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 187	German Sidearm (?) Hi everyone. I am the owner of the item, which my good friend Stu has kindly posted for me. There are no markings other than those already mentioned. I shall attempt to attach 2 pics of the piece side by side with a Snider sword bayonet, for comparative purposes. Thank you for your assistance. Brian Attached Images

10th November 2008, 07:03 PM	#4
William V. Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 33	The marking could be: Weyersberg & Stamm Solingen All the best William

15th November 2008, 12:40 PM	#6
Atlantia Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: The Sharp end Posts: 2,928	http://www.old-smithy.info/bayonets/...n%20models.htm About half way down the page. Still can't place tha hilt on yours.