Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 8th May 2009, 07:19 PM   #1
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
Default twohandsword/twohander/bidenhander/zweihander

maybe we can get this fascinated weapon structured.
(in my house the twohanders are still a chaos, see pic.)

Landsknecht two hander? 16thC fighting twohanders ? Stantler twohander ?
when did the two hander became processional ? did they also fight with processional two handers? different flamberge blade types ?
the beautiful Braunschweiger twohander? fishtailpommels? difference in swordstyles between countries

looking forward to the reactions?

best regards
Attached Images
 
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 12:02 PM   #2
Paul Macdonald
Member
 
Paul Macdonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 48
Default

That`s one beautiful and rare collection you have there!

Great to see, and I would love to see some even closer details on some of these.

Two handed swords have been used as procession swords for as long as they have been around. For official ceremony or parade, the two handed sword is a clear and mighty symbol of power, status and justice.

There is however a difference between two handed swords made exclusively for ceremony and those made first for practical use that may also have been used for ceremony.

From your photograph, all the swords shown there appear to be practical two handers, all crafted for practical martial use (and there`s a couple there that I bet fly nicely )
It is possible that these have been used as processional swords at some stage in their life, but without contextual provenance, is impossible to prove.

Processional swords that are designed for ceremonial use firstly are evident by their form, dimensions or construction, which may all be outwith practical considerations and requirements.

Ceremonial Form -

The State Sword of Scotland is a good example of a sword hilt designed primarily for ceremonial use.



The blade is in fact a nicely forged and crafted piece that could be put to practical use if required, but the hilt is clearly ceremonial in nature.
All hilt elements are elaborately designed and covered in gilt work. The quillions are nicely formed, yet too thin for practical design. The grip is also metal and of a form not designed with comfort and effective grip in mind. The pommel is also overly large and hollow, which lends a greater canvas for the craftsman to present his skills, but is not so practical for any fighting sword.

Ceremonial Dimensions -

To create the impression of an ultimate symbol of power and status, some swords were created primarily for ceremonial impression.
The two handed sword presently on display at the Royal Museum of Scotland at Chambers Street, Edinburgh, is a fitting example of this (centre of image below).



This is a sword crafted in traditional form, but excessive dimensions.
Note the Highland two hander and Lowland two hander on each side. The Highland sword has a blade length of approx. 40", which by scale give the ceremonial sword an overall length well in excess of 80"!
This is one huge piece, with the blade as broad as your hand.
The sword is well made, with a nice blade in fact, but far too large for any practical use.

Ceremonial Construction -

In the Great Hall of Edinburgh Castle there are many swords. A great many original basket hilts and early sabres, one questionable Highland two hander, and two large pieces that at first glance appear to be nicely made German zweihanders.



The swords are of traditional form and dimensions, but closer inspection reveals their true nature.

The blades are excessively thick at the forte and down the length of the blade, indicating a blade weight outwith practical considerations. The grip and pommel are also carved from the same piece of wood. Aye, you heard it right, wooden pommels!
This confirms that these swords are created firstly to look the part, most likely for ceremonial use.

Another possibility exists, that these swords may have been created simply to look the part for a castle or stately home great hall in the C19th, given the gothic revival at this time. Only a closer study to period of manufacture could suggest further or otherwise.

With regard to ceremonial two handers however, I hope that the above observations might be helpful in your research.

All the best,

Macdonald
Paul Macdonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2009, 06:51 PM   #3
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
Default

Hi Paul,

I just noticed your very valuable information and pictures, especially the two handers in the great hall of Edinburgh's castle are very interesting.

thanks a lot

regards from Holland
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2009, 06:50 PM   #4
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
Default

.
Attached Images
           

Last edited by cornelistromp; 9th June 2009 at 08:27 PM.
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2009, 08:39 PM   #5
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
Default

.
Attached Images
    
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2009, 09:07 PM   #6
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
Default

.
Attached Images
            
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 02:05 PM   #7
thinreadline
Member
 
thinreadline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
Default

This is my two hander for what its worth. It's approx 150 cm long , the blade is in very poor condition so as the hilt is very good I assume that the two got togther at a later date . The blade is remarkably flexible and exhibits none of the stiffness that I associate with these large swords .
Attached Images
    
thinreadline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 02:24 PM   #8
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,642
Default

Hi Richmond,
Can we have a close(r) picture of the hilt.
... If you don't mind, of course
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 02:48 PM   #9
thinreadline
Member
 
thinreadline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
Hi Richmond,
Can we have a close(r) picture of the hilt.
... If you don't mind, of course
Not at all , you are welcome ...
Attached Images
         

Last edited by thinreadline; 26th June 2012 at 03:47 PM.
thinreadline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 04:33 PM   #10
Matchlock
(deceased)
 
Matchlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
Default

Hi Richmond,


The ornamental style of the carvings on the hilt seems to point towars ca. 1560, based on the acanthus leaves, although the profuse piercings would suggest somewhat earlier stylistic aesthetics of ca. 1530.

The irregular corrosion of the blade reminds me of swords salvaged from tombs, showing heavy rust only in places that were in close contact with the body.

As to the flexibility of the blade I can tell by experience that blades of two-handed swords are far from being stiff; they are highly flexible instead.


Best,
m
Matchlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 04:59 PM   #11
thinreadline
Member
 
thinreadline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matchlock
Hi Richmond,


The ornamental style of the carvings on the hilt seems to point towars ca. 1560, based on the acanthus leaves, although the profuse piercings would suggest somewhat earlier stylistic aesthetics of ca. 1530.

The irregular corrosion of the blade reminds me of swords salvaged from tombs, showing heavy rust only in places that were in close contact with the body.

As to the flexibility of the blade I can tell by experience that blades of two-handed swords are far from being stiff; they are highly flexible instead.


Best,
m
That is very inteersting if a little eerie !
thinreadline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 04:38 PM   #12
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
Default

the flexible blade seems very good, I see this more often on two handers. The hilt is beautiful but it seems to me 19thC, although Italians also have created this kind of artwork in the 16th century.

best,
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 04:50 PM   #13
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp
... The hilt is beautiful but it seems to me 19thC ...
I am not even a novice but, that was my fear, when i asked Richmond for close ups.
... But again, my opinion is worthless .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 05:00 PM   #14
thinreadline
Member
 
thinreadline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp
the flexible blade seems very good, I see this more often on two handers. The hilt is beautiful but it seems to me 19thC, although Italians also have created this kind of artwork in the 16th century.

best,
Thank you .... that is a possibility of course ... there seems a concensus about the flexibility of these blades which is comforting !
thinreadline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2012, 09:45 PM   #15
Matchlock
(deceased)
 
Matchlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp
the flexible blade seems very good, I see this more often on two handers. The hilt is beautiful but it seems to me 19thC, although Italians also have created this kind of artwork in the 16th century.

best,

Oh yeah, Jasper,

A 19th c. guess concerning the hilt was my first thought as the decorative edges of the quillons seem so crisp - but I did not feel sure as I did not handle it and neither intended to arise negative feelings ...
Thus I confined to pointing out the stylistic criteria.

Best,
m
Matchlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.