Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13th January 2013, 08:08 PM   #1
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Exclamation Photo Request - Burmese Gen. Maha Bandula's surrendered Armour @ the Tower of London

Okay, I will test my luck here too....I had been told before that at one time at least the famous Burmese General Mana Bandula's surrendered armour was on display at the Tower of London. I do not know if they allow photos taken in the Tower of London...and don't want anyone getting locked up there for the sake of the forum but it would be most interesting to see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maha_Bandula

I believe his armour was surrendered at the Treaty of Yandabo during the first Anglo Burman war:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Yandabo

I have seen an old photo of his armour and you can see the strong Indian influence. And also there is depictions of him in Burmese style military dress.
Attached Images
  
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th January 2013, 10:30 PM   #2
aiontay
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Default

I won't vouch for the accuracy of this, but the Kachins claim he was a Kachin. They point out that his name isn't Burmese and that Ban Du La (Maha was a title) sounds Kachin. Of course, that has nothing to do with his armor.
aiontay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2013, 11:08 PM   #3
David R
Member
 
David R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,048
Default

This looks very like a couple of the armours in the Royal Armouries Leeds. Give them a call or an email, they are very friendly and cooperative and will have photo's on file, they don't charge a lot either in my experience. You will also get a better picture, without distortion from the glass of the case.
David R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2013, 12:48 AM   #4
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David R
This looks very like a couple of the armours in the Royal Armouries Leeds. Give them a call or an email, they are very friendly and cooperative and will have photo's on file, they don't charge a lot either in my experience. You will also get a better picture, without distortion from the glass of the case.
Great idea David R I will give it a shot and see what happens and report back!
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2013, 07:45 AM   #5
estcrh
Member
 
estcrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathaniel
I have seen an old photo of his armour and you can see the strong Indian influence.
Nathaniel, I actually think that is an Indian armor, a chilta hazar masha or coat of a thousand nails. Here is a comparison image with one from the Wallace Collection, London England.
Attached Images
 
estcrh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2013, 04:35 AM   #6
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by estcrh
Nathaniel, I actually think that is an Indian armor, a chilta hazar masha or coat of a thousand nails. Here is a comparison image with one from the Wallace Collection, London England.
Thanks Estcrh for the id & picture. That is the curious thing for sure about this label as the Burmese generals armour...it is clearly Indian, that I have known...that is part of why I'm curious to see if the suit of armour I was told that is in the Tower of London is the same. India was obviously a neighbor and there was allot of informational exchange between the region so it's quite possible that the general could have had an Indian suit of armour...but it does seem a bit odd a the same time...most other Burmese images (statues, paintings) of course have him in the more familiar Burmese military official attire...

Also @ Aiontay, you are the 2nd person who has mentioned to me about the Kachin claim to the ethnic roots of Maha Bandula. Thank you for posting...very interesting.
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2013, 12:49 PM   #7
aiontay
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Default

During the early 19th century the Kachins were already established in Assam (the Singhpo) and were also raiding Manipur, so maybe that is how he got his Indian armor. I'm joking, but there was plenty of contact with India, as you note. Remember how the First Burmese War got started after all.
aiontay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2013, 01:43 PM   #8
Gavin Nugent
Member
 
Gavin Nugent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
Default

Although after Mana Bandula's death, Scott writes in the mid 1880s about Mandalay.
He states that the outer suburbs housed over 100,000 people, being the traders and general population and that the wealth was in the hands of the Chinese and Moguls with whom the king was afraid to meddle.
He goes on to say, quote, "the grim-visaged Mogul, who could buy up half the town".
This is likely the case in other regions of Burma in earlier times too.

If this Mogul weath and trade centre existed as strongly back then through exporting vast amounts of products back to India, this could well have influneced and provided such a type of armour to Mana Bandula's court.

Just a little more food for thought :-)

Gav
Gavin Nugent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2013, 04:09 AM   #9
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Default

Thanks Gavin citing the informative historical account...I think it is definitely plausible that the wealthy would have the money to incorporate foreign armour dress just like they would use foreign weapons.

I ran into a separate reference to Maha Bandula's armour in UK

"The armour of Maha Bandular once was displayed at British museum. The style of it is very similar to Rajput brigandine armour called Chihal'Ta Hazar Masha (Coat of the thousand nails)"
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2013, 04:26 AM   #10
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by estcrh
Nathaniel, I actually think that is an Indian armor, a chilta hazar masha or coat of a thousand nails. Here is a comparison image with one from the Wallace Collection, London England.
Estcrh, I was looking again at the example of a Chilta Hazar Masha you provided from the Wallance Collection compared to the black and white photo labeled as General Maha Bandula's armour and wow! it looks like it is almost an exact match...I'm not saying this particular one is Maha Bandula's, but at least they are very similar.
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2013, 05:07 AM   #11
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Default

Okay, found the cite ... Tower Armouries. Thanks to Google Books: Oriental Armour by H. Russell Robinson.

Page 103: "In the Tower Armouries there is an armour of the type just described which has become associated with the Burmese general Maha Bandula, who died at the Battle of Donabyu in 1825 - an unlikely story, for which there is no supporting evidence. Another variant of this studded armour is a short- skirted coat, opening in the front, with a series of rectangular plats attached vertically to the upper par - one on each breast, one under each arm and two at the back. An example in the Tower Armouries has applied gilt borders to the plates instead of gold damascene (Pl. XIV, C) The Rajputs called these armours chibal'ta bazar masha ('coat of a thousand nails')."
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.