Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12th April 2015, 02:17 AM   #1
archer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Default Wilkinson Tulwar

Just in a Wilkinson bladed Tulwar. A quick search thru old threads came up with http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...lkinson+tulwar explaining this was likely from the Manton 1927 Catalog or very similar. The unsharpened blade is 23 inches long and
hand room is small around three inches. Hardly any handling damage
seen knuckle guard has a few cuts and a knick toward the front of the blade.
i'm wondering how long after 1927 were they being made or was Mantons catalog like Bannermans of the same era?
Attached Images
      
archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2015, 12:34 PM   #2
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,855
Default

Archer,

Interesting sword and lovely blade. The pommel strikes me as somehow having been altered. What's your take from what you can see there?
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2015, 06:14 PM   #3
archer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Default reply

Charles,
Perhaps a crushed presentation Hilt. While somewhat resembling the knuckle bowed hilt in the Manton catalog which appears to be symmetrical. this one is not at all. The odd pommel disk is both tear drop shaped and mounted askew. I haven't a clue if this was a personal modification, or who may have made the hilt and if others exist. The disk may have been a crude repair, odd since the blade has not been sharpened. My hope is that Berkley, McCormic, Jeff and others will fill in the blanks. There seems to be
Manton of Calcutta catalogs out their with photos.
Attached Images
   
archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2015, 06:29 PM   #4
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Am I missing something?

Queen Elizabeth the 2nd came to reign in 1953 & the style of marking looks later than that.
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2015, 11:31 PM   #5
archer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Default Great point

Hi Spiral,

You made a great point. Thus far my only reference has been the post I cited.
This weapons age is a total mystery to Me. Putting it in at least the50s may
well mean it is a presentation of some sort and explain why the blade was never sharpened. Thank you, Steve P.S. The same label is etched on both sides of the blade.
archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2015, 11:37 PM   #6
Norman McCormick
Member
 
Norman McCormick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,573
Default

Hi Archer,
Presentation piece could be an explanation although the hilt doesn't look to me to be of presentation quality, it would appear maybe to have been rehilted or perhaps just not very well repaired at some point in its life. The only other explanation I can think of would be a special order run for some individual or group.
My Regards,
Norman.

P.S. Indian hilts are not necessarily mounted 'in line' with the blade therefore giving the effect of hilt and blade out of 'kilter'.

Last edited by Norman McCormick; 13th April 2015 at 12:14 AM.
Norman McCormick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 05:19 AM   #7
archer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Default Hilt

So, what are we looking at here? How late would this blade as etched have been made? That would give us a time frame. My comments about presentation were based on the Manton catalogs description. I have to agree it was likely hilted in India due the confined hand area. The comment on the pommel "disk" has mainly to do with it's odd shape. So is it just a very recent knock off?
archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 06:20 AM   #8
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,728
Default

I would suggest that Manton & Co have nothing to do with this sword whatsoever. They have been out of business for too long, and anyway were quality GUN makers. They may have sold swords, but as far as I am aware did not make them.
As for this being a presentation sword TOTALY made by Wilkinson, I would rather doubt it. They would not have hilted a quality blade with a hilt like this IMHO.
I believe you have something knobbled together.....

Last edited by kahnjar1; 13th April 2015 at 08:32 PM. Reason: Slight re-jig of text
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 06:10 PM   #9
Norman McCormick
Member
 
Norman McCormick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archer
So, what are we looking at here? How late would this blade as etched have been made? That would give us a time frame. My comments about presentation were based on the Manton catalogs description. I have to agree it was likely hilted in India due the confined hand area. The comment on the pommel "disk" has mainly to do with it's odd shape. So is it just a very recent knock off?

Queen Elizabeth ascended the throne in 1952 and Wilkinson closed its sword business in 2005.
Norman McCormick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 06:17 PM   #10
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,719
Default

Perfectly deduced guys!!! In reading this it is truly a pleasure to see this kind of analysis and discussion!!! Excellent points on Manton etc.
True forensics, thanks so much.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 08:36 PM   #11
thinreadline
Member
 
thinreadline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
Default

The Manton name was bought and used by a firm in Birmingham sometime in the late 1980s . They produced a whole range of edged weapons with spurious markings , I believe the weapons themselves were mostly manufactured in India .
thinreadline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 08:39 PM   #12
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

double post...
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 08:41 PM   #13
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinreadline
The Manton name was bought and used by a firm in Birmingham sometime in the late 1980s . They produced a whole range of edged weapons with spurious markings , I believe the weapons themselves were mostly manufactured in India .
In that last era of the firm, I believe that's true of many Wilkinson sword blades as well.

When the firm shut down thousands blades, both completed, faulty, pattern cubboard & unfinished hit the market at very cheap prices, both officially by Wilkinsons & unofficially by all the blokes getting made redundant who worked there who filled there car boots with them. {Which due to circumstance's the management ignored.}

I suspect this is an unfinished blade from there store rooms re hilted for re sale by someone not even competent enough to put an apparently original sharp edge on it.

Last edited by spiral; 13th April 2015 at 08:55 PM.
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2015, 10:14 PM   #14
asomotif
Member
 
asomotif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,219
Default

Is this a tulwar blade ?

Could it be a Sappeurs blade ?

Best regards,
Willem
asomotif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2015, 03:53 AM   #15
archer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Default OOPS

This is one of those times when a little bit of knowledge can be painful.
thanks to all hopefully lesson learned we'll see.
steve
archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2015, 04:11 AM   #16
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,728
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by archer
This is one of those times when a little bit of knowledge can be painful.
thanks to all hopefully lesson learned we'll see.
steve
Hi Steve,
An old collector friend of mine, now sadly passed on, once said to me that "if it does not look right, then it probably isn't".
A very useful statement to remember, but then there are times, and I guess we have all had them, that we make mistakes, but hopefully we learn from them................
Stu
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2015, 08:40 PM   #17
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archer
This is one of those times when a little bit of knowledge can be painful.
thanks to all hopefully lesson learned we'll see.
steve
Thank you, Its nice when the messenger doesn't get shot...
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2015, 11:44 PM   #18
archer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Default Homeward bond

Spiral,
Thanks again for the heads up it's on it's way back now and I'm not sure at all that I would have picked up on it. Steve
archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2015, 08:05 PM   #19
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

signed for delivery I trust?
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.