Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 30th November 2008, 11:14 PM   #31
BluErf
Member
 
BluErf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
Default

Hi Alan,

Oh, thanks. How about making a comparison between 2 Javanese kerises then? I'm sure the applicability of the comparison would not be in question, and forumnites would love to learn a bit or two. A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step.
BluErf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2008, 11:40 PM   #32
asomotif
Member
 
asomotif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,221
Default

Very nice Bugis keris, would like to pick up something similar any day.

As for :
Quote:
Note the "fatness"!
Can or should we call this Rubenesque in the future ?
asomotif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 01:30 AM   #33
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,767
Default

No Kai Wee, I'm not going to do that, as at the present time it would only compound my error.

What I will try to do is produce an article on the art of the Javanese blade. I've actually already started this, but as with all my projects, there is not enough time to go around.

It would be nice if I could point to something that has already been written on this subject, but to my knowledge it has never been addressed---its the old story:- those who know do not go into print.

Anyway, once there is some general understanding of the concepts involved---which is far too big a subject to address in a post to a thread--- maybe we can have some meaningful discussion.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 01:48 AM   #34
PenangsangII
Member
 
PenangsangII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluErf
How was that conclusion reached?

Tok Chu was supposedly one of the last great pandai keris in N Malaya. Anyone who commissioned a keris by him would have paid a lot. I'm sure the keris here can be used for fighting, just like any other keris, but would the primary purpose be for fighting or status/aesthetic appreciation?
The conclusion was based on malay ORAL tradition - the robustness and the wesi type also contributed to the Malays' minds that this tok chu type is meant for fighting 1st, and other functions come seconds and so on. No doubt the original kerises commissioned by Tok Chu would have paid a lot of money (maybe palace related ppl), but the numbers were certainly no more than hundreds. He could be an empu tindih for the palace.......
PenangsangII is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.