|
|
|
3rd March 2023, 01:12 PM
|
#1 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,065
|
Thread re-opened -- two antogonists gone for good
This thread is now open again. You will note that some posts have been deleted for off topic comments and argumentative/sarcastic/abusive behavior. The two protagonists, long term contributors here, have exhausted the patience of all moderators and staff. Despite our attempts to moderate their interactions, they could not refrain from attacking each other. They will no longer be posting here.
|
|
|
|
3rd March 2023, 08:02 PM
|
#2 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,143
|
I agree with the Indo-Persian origins.
|
|
|
|
|
12th March 2023, 05:32 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 113
|
Was gone for a week or so
Sorry, I missed the conflicting posts. I had no intention of initiating a post that would create any contention.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12th March 2023, 05:49 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 113
|
Another MET example
Thanks everyone for all of your input, thoughts and advice. This piece really has me stumped.
I saw this one in the attached pic listed in the MET collection. Attributed to Persia. Albeit the MET example has far superior gold damascene work. I felt that the lines were similar along the center, rib, as well as the profiles. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
