|
13th March 2022, 03:51 AM | #1 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
@bathala Regarding the use of "thesis" it's different from "hypothesis" of the scientific method, which is to be proven. In this case, as with other theses, Atienza's is documentation. It would be nice if this were corroborated, but currently I'm not aware of any document from that era that has similar content |
|
13th March 2022, 04:56 AM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
|
|
13th March 2022, 05:51 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
|
|
13th March 2022, 06:05 AM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
|
|
13th March 2022, 12:20 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 598
|
Sorry I couldn't see the pic. Your suggestion to salt-ify the document is noted, as I am always open to new and updated information. I guess that I prefer it as just my personal label, as I have no other term to call that particular profile. Thanks for your thoughts.
|
14th March 2022, 02:39 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
|
|
15th March 2022, 03:02 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 9
|
Just my take on this. Yes, his account give us an idea of blade typology or names during his time. But the question is, how accurate is the account? How credible is the author? Who was he? Was this peer reviewed? These questions arise cause the fact that it was only a thesis and not a published work makes this a bit sketchy.
|
|
|