|
19th August 2017, 09:21 PM | #1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
|
|
19th August 2017, 10:54 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
This is a great in depth study into the whats in a word(letter) syndrome. There is a small pile of weapons across the Ethnographic stratum which have such pickled wording and spelling as to be a veritable knot of muddled and mixed up mess. It is a brave researcher who will take on any of this centuries old train crash.. In his dissertation Ariel shows how to go about unpicking the puzzle. I can think of a dozen or more twisted or misapplied words for various weapons that we know little about..and noted by Jim above . The word Nimcha, for example, is just one baffling arrangement...often caused by Ethnographics experts and authors who transcribe these errors into their work from previous authors.
Perhaps the thread should be better termed ..the.. What's in a Word and any such muddles can be added onto it and see where the thread is after a year or two... it could be an epic. |
19th August 2017, 10:58 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,246
|
Great work, Ariel!
Regards, Kai |
19th August 2017, 11:23 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,770
|
Mercenary:- I believe that you will find the unwritten vowels to which you refer are certainly non-existent in script, but exist only in speech, where they are identified as "allophones". In other words, the vowels do not exist, they only appear to exist because of pronunciation.
An allophone is a variation of the phoneme, and this variation can be inconsistent, varying from geographic location to geographic location, and forming a contributing factor to regional accents, it can even vary from person to person where it can assist in identifying an individual speaker. This occurs in all languages. (a phoneme is a unit of sound in a particular language; an allophone is a variation of a spoken phoneme) My apologies for the pedantry, but my post #9 was the short version of a 20 minute lecture. Ariel:- I am 100% on your side of this debate, not that I have much interest at all in kards, or karuds, or cards, or careds, or gareds, or pesh-kabz either for that matter, but I do have an interest in language. What I can see here is something that has existed in my own field of interest (the keris) forever. Whole Ensiklopedias have been written that rotate around this variation in name and pronunciation, and what we have at the present time in the field of keris study is a number of kinds of Collectorise --- or Kulicterize if you prefer --- where the words used by one group of people are unrecognisable to another group of people. However, in any attempts to achieve conformity in the written representation of a spoken sound we do encounter some insurmountable barriers. Then there are other difficulties when we come to the term of reference used to name or describe any physical object. Although I do try to be precise in my own communication, I still sometimes fail in this. It is reasonable to accept that others can be less than precise also, provided that clarification can be achieved in discussion. |
20th August 2017, 10:34 AM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
Last edited by Mercenary; 20th August 2017 at 10:45 AM. |
|
|
|