|
8th July 2013, 09:51 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,154
|
the 2.75 inch tang seems rather short for a hewing weapon.
|
8th July 2013, 10:30 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
I suspect more mainland SEA for the origians rather than China.
If China proper, I'd typically expect a socket fit. Regards Gavin |
8th July 2013, 10:57 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
Doesn't look Chinese to me. My first two guesses would be Thai and Indian. Followed by Philippines and Indonesia.
For precedents, rather than Chinese ge/ji, how about the Japanese hoko? (The more modern (i.e., Medieval and Edo) hoko, which is a spear with side hook/blade, rather than the ancient hoko, which was just an ordinary spear.) Some examples in Stone, and also in Knutsen (Japanese Polearms & Japanese Spears). AKA kata-kama-yari. |
13th July 2013, 09:14 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
To me it looks like it might almost be African. Either way, the tang has not been peened and there is no other method of attachment, so I would guess it is a ceremonial or tourist piece that was hammered into a pole without being further secured.
Josh |
14th July 2013, 05:27 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
An astute reader has pointed out to me that these are Vietnamese and are shown in the Hanoi museum.
Gavin |
14th July 2013, 08:56 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
thank gavin |
|
31st July 2013, 07:54 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
Gavin-
I believe your assessment but I find it confusing. I have a few Vietnamese pieces and they are rather more refined than the appearance on this one. What do you think accounts for the crude look Josh |
|
|