Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14th March 2010, 12:22 PM   #1
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Smile

just for comparison.
Attached Images
    

Last edited by Gustav; 14th March 2010 at 08:06 PM.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2010, 06:44 PM   #2
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
Default

Thank you Alan and Kai Wee for your responses. Terengganu is where i had thought this keris was from, but when Alan expressed that respected people on this subject had suggested to him that this kind of topographic relief pamor is virtually unknown from this area it raised a serious question with me about it's origin. Ultimately where it is from would not effect my liking for this keris, but it is an important piece of information that i would like to have correct about any keris i own if possible.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2010, 07:32 PM   #3
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

File marks seem also to be not unusual, becouse of the resharpening praktice.

Last edited by Gustav; 14th March 2010 at 08:24 PM.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2010, 08:27 PM   #4
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
File marks seem also to be not unusual, becouse of the resharpening praktice.
I am not aware of any resharpening practice. Can you elaborate?
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2010, 09:54 AM   #5
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

As I understand it, in bugis influenced regions some value is put also on the sharpness of the edges, so the blades were sometimes resharpened. I mean, I can see some resharpening (or file) work also on your blade.

Anybody please correct me, if this is wrong.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2010, 11:45 PM   #6
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

Has anybody seen this one alive? Is this a documentated sundang? If yes, what about the age of fittings? It seems to have a sheath mouth from other material.

The other one (excuse me please for using your picture, VVV) also.
Attached Images
  

Last edited by Gustav; 16th March 2010 at 12:14 AM.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2010, 11:40 AM   #7
PenangsangII
Member
 
PenangsangII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 401
Default

IMHO, Gustav's keris blade is recent Maduran made dressed in antique hulu, and repaired sheath - classic case of a seller meant to jack up his commodity. David's blade also look quite recent, I think peninsula made and aged less than 50 yrs.... but then its only an opinion....
PenangsangII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2010, 12:43 AM   #8
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
As I understand it, in bugis influenced regions some value is put also on the sharpness of the edges, so the blades were sometimes resharpened. I mean, I can see some resharpening (or file) work also on your blade.

Anybody please correct me, if this is wrong.
I could be wrong, but i think any file marks that may be visible were part of the origin shaping of this keris.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2010, 09:37 AM   #9
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

You are most probably wright, David. The edges on greneng and kembang kacang are not really worn; this keris never needed resharpening, becouse it's probably very near to the original condition. What was my point, is the possibility of a visible file work on a non-Madura piece.

I ask me, if the sheath of the "initial" keris, if it's something older, would be not to small for any sundang at the mouth (maybe not for a sundang patrem ), the keris in it should be not to large (32,3 cm length from Ebay description).

Of course the sheath could be reshaped at the mouth and shortened (it would be the answer for the possibly new buntut), and this must leave signs. Are they visible on this sheath?

I suppose, it would be less complicated to make a new sheath then recarve a sundang sheath to this size.
Attached Images
  

Last edited by Gustav; 17th March 2010 at 09:37 AM.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.