![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
AFAIK, Telesporo SubingSubing came from Balamban, Cebu. There are some old Visayan outposts on Mindanao and during the last century many Visayans settled throughout Mindanao. From all accounts there is no open teaching of any traditional Moro MA/Silat on this island (if any); the Sulu archipelago might be a better place to look for genuine Moro MA but even there you'd have to be careful not to run into Visayan MA nowadays... Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
|
![]()
Interesting. I wasn't aware of how widespread the Visayan arts were back then. Although I do find it unfortunate that this did not end up being actual moro martial arts, I appreciate the clarificaion very much. Thanks for the input, kai!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
|
![]()
I'd really like to get in to this area also and learn(or at least have a better understanding) the origins of Moro Martial Arts, as well as Visayan Martial Arts. I do not have a firm understanding of either right now, right now I take a style stemming from Cebu...and from class, the history doesn't go that deep. So this thread intrigues me, and I hope you guys can further help me in which ever way. As I posted earlier, I find it interesting that Moro arts seems to be so hidden from the public eye...obviously there is an art, but even today most people have no clue on what it is or what it looks like. So Subingsubing kinda fascinates me as most seem to associate him with Moro arts. I just did a search right now and found this post in a martial arts forum. This guys seems to be well hearsed in FMA history, and makes claims that possibly can be supported. Just thought I'd throw this in there.
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Dimasalang; 26th February 2010 at 07:12 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
|
![]()
And here, I thought I was providing some helpful info when really I perpetuated some FMA-half truth I've been seeking to rid myself of!
Very informative post, Dimasalang! I find that a lot of FMA, because of the lack of a cohesive martial history, is steeped in this sort of half-truth and barely researched history that I really detest. A lot of it I was fed and believed until recent years and decided to joing message boards such as this to clarify which was myth and which was truth. It's very difficult to unlearn what I've come to accept as complete truth, but forum members like you and kai make the experience so enriching that I'm glad I decided to dig deeper. I found this part of your quoted post in particular most interesting: Quote:
This was also of interest to me, as it helped me understand why FMA really stands out stylistically when compared to other styles from neigboring regions and why a lot of widespread FMA has been attributed to have origins from just a few specific regions of the Philippines: Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
|
![]()
Pepperskull, this is what makes this place so great! We can all learn and collaborate together and "iron out" these issues.
It is also a great peeve of mine to hear our history(general or of martial arts) being given in half-truth history lessons. Given our culture, the elders are always correct in speaking(even when it is their opinion), and the young must never question and must obey. Our elders never want document anything in writing...I don't understand why. And look at our history now, it is filled with so many holes, us Fil-Ams have a hard time finding and understanding our own identity when we go looking for it...there is no real reference and things just contradict one another...it ends up making no sense at all. Even older eskrimadors don't want to put their curriculum and lessons in writing...they all feel what ever is in their brain is enough. My only guess would be they believe their written secrets can get stolen? Just think, as it is being shown now, when they die, they take to the grave that great legacy as well. When one master falls, so does part of FMA history. So this is why I think it is important now(in this moment in time) to figure all this out...while there are still some old school eskrimadors walking around. Best way would be to interview and document for ourselves, since they sure don't want to. I believe the quote you highlight about the Moro Moro plays should be emphasized above all else first. Most, even now in the Philippines, when they hear the term "Moro Moro Plays" they associate it with the war between the Spanish and the Moros of southern Philippines...which is untrue. As stated in the quote, the plays are about the war in southern Spain when the "Moors" from north Africa invaded. Moors is the English term; the Spanish have always called the Moors "Moros" since the very beginning. It is from the north African Moors(Moros), where the Spanish gave the southern Philippine Muslims their name "Moros". And it is through the reenactment of these Moro Moro plays "Christianized" Filipinos hid and practiced their martial art. After reading the entire thread from where that quote came from, it looks like it was written by Celestino "Tinni" Macachor(who is based out of Cebu). Aside from being a researching historian, he is also one of the pillars of De Campo JDC-IO. He is the co-author of the book, Cebuano Eskrima: Beyond the Myth...which delves heavily in to the history of Visayan eskrima. I actually have this book and it is extremely deep. But I have only read a few of the chapters...I think I'll have to sit down now and read it in its entirety. You can also email Tinni Macachor at ambangmac53@yahoo.com. I think I need to send him a few emails. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
|
![]() Quote:
Indeed. This is why I enjoy this particular forum. FMA sites tend to derail into petty bickering, as the rules are never clearly stated or enforced, and people in other forums have a habit of being too invested emotionally into an argument. Here, we can disagree yet still maintain an enjoyable degree of polite discourse. Because of this, I find that we accomplish more. The purpose of this message board seems to lead more towards what is correct, and not who is correct. A very very welcome change in my internet experience. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: between work and sleep
Posts: 731
|
![]() ![]() I have almost nothing to add... I know so little about this area but I am thoroughly enjoying this discussion. So, thanks guys. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() on the non-documentation of things by our forefathers, i think it's a case to case basis. because as i'm sure you also know, the so-called "philippine insurgent records" (the term used by the americans for those docs gathered during the occupation period) are literally several tons of papers (gathered from the fleeing phil. forces from 1898 up to their surrender). they continue to be a treasure trove of info for researchers here in manila. but you are definitely right that other than those bunch of very impt. papers, there's nothing much original (i.e., written by filipinos themselves). of course we do have the spaniards' accounts, via those parchment records. there's that built-in bias in their reporting understandably. but as one author said, there are "cracks in the parchment curtain" (cf. iron and bamboo curtains of ussr and china). thus we still can see what the true picture was, through the "cracks", in spite of the state-controlled reporting. also we do have a lot of myths and epics, passed down through generations via oral tradition. for sure there's a lot of hyperbole and other exaggerations in there. but still our peoples' way of life (including their weapons) are well-preserved in those epics and legends. on martial arts, i agree with you that the reason why the teachers don't put that in writing is for fear that they might get stolen. i mean if your life depended on it, why give away the ace up your sleeve? on the other hand, those battles are things of the past (well mostly). hence i think filipino martial arts (fma) schools everywhere should agree that they should divulge all their secrets to one another. and the common objective is to take the martial arts to a new level. i know that is easier said than done. but if fma is to be made even better, then the old mind set has to be thrown out the window ... just my two cent(avos) ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
This also happened to many Chinese martial arts as well and thus a lot of knowledge has been lost over the years as well.
Also, just to make it clear, there has been trade and Chinese in the Philippines for a 1000 years or more. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Torrance
Posts: 49
|
![]() Quote:
I am teacher of a FMA system that comes from the Visayan Mountains. My teacher favored the Pinute. He always told me that it was chinese that brought steel making to the island and then the Filipinos learn how from them. Many Chinese married into families in the Visayan region. He said that Chinese made trade weapons and swapped for gold along time ago. I have taken a number of my weapons and used them working out. What I have found is this: The type of strike and grace of motion is effected by shape and the weight of the blade. Depending if the FMA system and range you fight affects the sword, sword & dagger you would use. Yes many systems have influence of Indonisian, Spanish & Chinese as they would cross over when fighting and spying on them. I am current working on book on the basics of Filipino Martial Arts, it based upon my research of working with 30 different masters and teachers and keeping notes on common threads. The names of some of the moves may be different due to local dialect but the motion is always the same. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Just a bit of info from the book. In a nut shell... If seeking info on Moro arts, look to Silat. FMA, Arnis, and eskrima in general does NOT follow any form of Moro martial art. Any FMA art not falling under Silat that uses Moro clothing and weapons should be questioned. Eskrima is a tried and true Filipino Christian martial art unique to only the Philippines and evolved from fighting with the Moro raiders. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
We also remember that when the Spanish first took Manila there was a Moro Datu or Sultan there at the time .
They might have been more than occasional raiders . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|