![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Rick David Asomotif
The burn test gives a wooden smell (did the test on the hilt as well on an Indonesian statue cut out of horn to compare, both with that result, so perhaps my nose is not that fine anymore ![]() Itīs heavy compared to his size njo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Some BW pictures if that may help (perhaps a workshop in taking good pictures for this forum?)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Really nobody who can tell me who the person is?
Can someone show me the way then which literature or internetsite to consult? THKS for your suggestions Njo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
I think the problem we run into with positively identifying these Bali Figural hilts is called 'Artistic License' or 'Carver's Interpretation' .
Unless they are unmistakable in their form they are open to interpretation . ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,016
|
![]()
Yes Rick, that's pretty true, especially with figures that are current era production.
If we go back to before about the 1930's, I think we probably see figures in Balinese carving that are more readily identifiable with specific entities, but when we move into the current era we find a more free interpretation by carvers, and a lot of figures that could be regarded as generic representations. I'm not talking just about keris hilts, but about Balinese carvings of all shapes, sizes and qualities. In the case of this hilt under discussion, I feel that what we have is a generic demon --- the fangs --- so let's call him a raksasa. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|