![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,193
|
![]() Quote:
David, you are truly incredibly astute, and the connection does present distinct possibilities. I am so glad that Mikey ![]() It would seem that it is most likely a guild associated marking, as it is typically congruent to other markings often associated with particular makers rather than a designation for a maker itself. It was long believed that the markings had begun in Genoa, as it had become associated with trade blades from Genoa and many so marked, but it was as well known in Lucca and other centers as well. What was key was that Genoa was an export port as well as having established colonies in the outer regions of trade networks such as the Black Sea, and from here these blades were diffused widely. Eventually the markings, in various interpretation, became applied by other European armourers, as well as those in other cultural environments, such as in the Chechen regions (the 'gurda' blades) and in Afghanistan/North India usually on paluoar blades. This is at least what I have considered plausible thus far, and your observation definitely adds to what seems the true origins of this mysterious marking, in this case used in somewhat more complex grouping. Thank you so much for adding that, and Michael (aka Mikey ![]() The game is once again afoot! Forward!!!! All the very best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|