![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Rumpel
![]() Welcome to the forum ![]() I will try and contact the Sudan Archive at Durham to see if they can provide further information. The pommel design really has me stumped ![]() ![]() Kind regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
...the pommel ends in something very similar to what we would expect to see on an arm dagger.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Interesting article on Sultan Ali Dinar battle with the British in 1916 ...
http://www.kaiserscross.com/188001/224322.html Hi Stephen ![]() yes, I too have noticed the similarities to the finials ....the faceted type especially. Nice daggers ..... not in competition with Lew are we ![]() ![]() Regards David . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 75
|
![]()
the last weekend I promised to show another W.Clauberg blade, but mounted with a southern Takuba handle. It is definitily an old mounting. For me it is very curious because first the Tuareg never have such Arabic calligraphy on their blades (or have somebody one?), second the tip is always round and at least normal shorter then Kaskaras. My longest Takuba is 98 cm. This Kaskara/Takuba - I call it "Kaskuba" - measure 1,12 m, a little bit longer, than my longest Kaskara.
Also one addition to the Clauberg mark. I was wrong when I said I believe before 1850. I found a book with all marks from Solingen sword producers. The book say this standing knight was used the first time in 1850, not before. Regards Wolf www.spearcollector.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Wolf,
very nice.... a fantastic 'Kaskuba' ![]() ![]() ![]() The obvious possibility is a traded / captured blade ....very nice hilt. I wondered about the 'balance' of the sword ....many seem to have a light-weight hilt/pommel (with thin light blades)....with the longer length of blade / weight this would be a problem ....has the hilt/pommel been weighted to overcome this ? Wolf this sword deserves a seperate posting ![]() Kind Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
Wolf, could I bother you for a close up of the mark on the fourth blade from the right ?
Could it be this mark ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 75
|
![]()
David, traded or captured blade would be a possibility, but I'm wondering that such traditional people like the Tuareg could have done so.
The 'balance' of the sword is okay, not perfect but okay. But I believe it was more used for ceremonial purpose, not for fighting, because the edges are not sharp. The third Kaskara from the right have a very very similar blade, same size, same calligraphy, no sharp edges, same half moons on the blade. Only the Clauberg stamp is missing, mayby under the crossguard. I think is not special weighted, but not sure. The balance point is nearly 1/3 to 2/3, sure near to the handle, so I think it's okay. Rick, attached our two marks. As you can see a little bit different. Unfortunately I couldn't find any of them in all my books. Maybe someone from the forum can help.... Best Wolf www.spearcollector.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 75
|
![]()
ahhhh....I forgot to show another Kaskara with an unusual Pommel. You can find it in AMNH and I think collected in 1914/15 in Egypt.
So maybe a Sudanese Kaskara was taken by Mamluk warriors of Ottoman Egypt and convert with such a handle in a Mameluke weapon. Only a thought. There you also find this special headdress. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Ali_of_Egypt Wolf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|