![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the tips bud! I'll have to add some 511s to my dremel box 'O' bits! ![]() Norman. Looking good mate, silicon carbide paper on a block and files are the method I've alweays used. Slow as hell but forgiving of mistakes. Hmmm, hot air gun!! Good call! I might have to do my pair of bikiner Tulwars soon ![]() Gene. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
The funny thing is, that sometimes the 'lashes' are on the outside and sometimes on the inside. I don't know why that is, maybe it was the smith's decision, or maybe there is another reason for this.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,193
|
![]()
Hi Jens,
Markings are always a puzzle (as we know!! ![]() The native bladesmiths in India, among others, used interpretations of these markings as a mark of quality, and probably, as you note, applied the mark in whatever fashion they chose. It seems these sickle marks are almost standard on the blades of Afghan paluaors. Beautiful pattern in that blade!!! All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the explanation about the sickle marks, now we only have a few details left ![]() Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|