Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 5th January 2009, 06:58 AM   #16
Jeff Pringle
Member
 
Jeff Pringle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
Default

I’m sure the Turkish, Persian and Indian smiths were primarily working with metal from different production centers, which used somewhat different ores and processes. But perhaps the Turks were buying up all the ingots that were less prone to material loss and fracture while forging…
To recapture the old metal requires orchestrating the alloy, the ingot, the forging method, heat treatment, and even the polishing and etching - all have significant effects on the finished appearance.
To illustrate the importance of the ingot alloy to the pattern, here is metal from two modern ingots that were forged in a similar way. One of these is not going to ever look Persian!
Attached Images
  
Jeff Pringle is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.